Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much!
It was exactly what I was looking for.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:03 PM Daniel Stirnimann <
daniel.stirnim...@switch.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello Alex,
>
> > Is this expected behaviour? Is there any way to make the server avoid
> > proceeding with the resolution, when the
Hi all,
I have a RPZ setup to whitelist several domains.
The issue I am facing is that, even though domains are blocked, the cashing
DNS server still proceeds to resolve the domain. The bahavior that I was
hoping to see is the server to not bother resolving the domain if the RPZ
policy replies
Hi all,
I have the following problem: I run a caching dns server using bind9
v9.10.3 in a gateway device which it serves several internal LAN IP
addresses (clients). I am doing some traffic accounting in the gateway
device using Linux conntrack so as to calculate the generated client
traffic
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 7:27 PM Fred Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2022, Alex K wrote:
> > [...]
> > The problem now is that I see sometime 700MB of DNS traffic for 2GB of
> > Internet browsing within one month.
>
> That's an eyebrow raiser. Tunneling, antivirus (or
Hi Petr,
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:26 AM Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 06. 05. 22 17:02, Alex K wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have the following problem: I run a caching dns server using bind9
> > v9.10.3 in a gateway device which it serves several internal LAN IP
> >
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 11:48 AM Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 09. 05. 22 10:34, Alex K wrote:
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:26 AM Petr Špaček > <mailto:pspa...@isc.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 06. 05. 22 17:02, Alex K wrote:
&g
king random queries (PRSD), which your
> server cannot cache, so this causes it to generate much more Internet
> traffic; at least as much as the clients are generating. (0% cache hit
> ratio)
>
> Cheers, Greg
>
>
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 16:02, Alex K wrote:
>
&
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:46 PM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Alex K writes:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:51 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> maybe someone uses VPN over DNS...
> >> in such case, rate limiting of client comes to mind...
> >&g
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:51 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> >On 09. 05. 22 10:34, Alex K wrote:
> >>The initial and current approach is to provide DNS free of charge,
> >>which simplified things for me. Though the traffic in question is
> >>satellite traffic w
9 matches
Mail list logo
