into BIND now or does he intend to wait until it becomes an RFC?
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
down. Where is SAIC on that.
The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some new
fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a
better mousetrap can be built.
Thank you - I and my TLD holders thank you.
regards
joe baptista
--- On *Thu, 4
Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes resolution
failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed
slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade.
we'll see ..
regards
joe baptista
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote:
Joe Baptista wrote:
dnssec-enable yes;
and
dnssec-validation yes;
are the defaults since BIND 9.5
How do I turn it off.
Since you edited out the most important part of my post, I'll repeat
feed compared to DNScurve.
When we do, I'll be happy to write the
code.
It's happened - start writing.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
is
turned on by default in BIND. Incidentally - is it?
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote:
dnssec-enable yes;
and
dnssec-validation yes;
are the defaults since BIND 9.5
How do I turn it off.
Thanks
joe
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Now that OpenDNS the largest provider of public DNS supports DNSCurve
http://twitter.com/joebaptista/status/9555178362
Would it be possible to include DNScurve support in bind?
thanks
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
is being spent on
the DNSSEC make work project - time and energy wasted.
DNScurve installs - configures and runs. No need for a make work project.
agreed?
regards
joe baptista
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael Sinatra
mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu wrote:
On 02/23/10 18:31, Joe Baptista
* A 172.16.30.30
That will work too.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
that.
regards
joe baptista
If you need help get back to me privately.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:50 PM, fddi f...@gmx.it wrote:
Hello,
I need to setup a local named configuration so that ANY request will be
resolved
to a specific single IP only.
I mean any kind of DNS resolutin request
Since we have been talking about DNS recently here is an audio interview by
NPR with DNS inventor Dr. Paul Mockapetris
quote: *A friend of mine said I was smart enough to invent the DNS, but not
smart enough to own it,
*
http://bit.ly/8iSEql
This link guaranteed free of evil
(signed joe baptista
in the
old days.
As for you question concerning the browser converting the domain to punycode
before asking a nameserver - yes that is what some browsers do. I'm not sure
why because it must confuse some users when that happens.
regards
joe baptista
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Kai Szymanski k
the exact date and the only browser
I tested it on was Firefox.
Have you tried other browsers? And what browser(s) have you tested this on.
You have hit on a very important point here.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
will result in confusion.
The browser has to understand IDN. Most current browsers do, including (I
believe) IE 7 and later, Firefox 2 and later, and Safari 3 and later.
Does anyone have a list of idn domains? I'd like to try it out.
cheers
joe baptista
avoided at all costs.
cheers
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative
Accountable to the Internet community @large
You guys get excited over small potatoes. There are hundreds of millions of
potential DLV RRsets. This is not even a drop in the bucket.
cheers
joe baptista
p.s. this message does not imply i support dnssec deployment. dnscurve is
the solution to our woes http://bit.ly/pJVq4
On Thu, Jul 30
I don't think buddha cares much for bind.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
nb : Buddha peace themselve
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:41:17 -0400, Joe Baptista bapti...@publicroot.org
wrote:
You guys get excited over small potatoes
yes - you can do that. and even assign the same NS or other if you want. a
domain can be very large to the human eye. I'm not sure how many characters
- but more then 200 I think.
Go crazy.
regards
joe baptista
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Letkeman danletke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
limited
vision of the name space. But I'm sure it will improve.
cheers
joe baptista
- thats one recommend bookmark ;)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Jay Ess li...@netrogenic.com wrote:
DNSDigger.com - A massive reverse resolver that lets you dig deeper into
the Net.
DNSDigger.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
