This is more of a registry/registrar question than a BIND/DNS question.
About the only _generic_ advice I can give you -- since you obscured the
domain names and the relevant addresses, so I can't actually check
anything on my own -- is to query the .eu servers directly for the
delegation
On 9/27/2010 8:48 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
I run a number of internal clients on 10 address space. what i did was break up
each Zone into Class B's 10.1.x.x , 10.2.x.x then my forward and reverse files
into class C's. Each record 10.1.1.x . 10.1.2.x, 10.1.3.x, . then scale ass
needed.
On 9/29/2010 12:37 AM, SW wrote:
Hi everyone...
I am rather new to the world of DNS so I'm hoping to get some of your
expertise...
Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence? For
example, if I assign 2 IP addresses to an A record, is it possible to
have it respond like...
Per-zone recursion control doesn't exist in BIND, because frankly it
doesn't make sense.
Either a zone type is meaningless *without* recursion (type forward,
type stub), or recursion is *unnecessary* because the nameserver answers
from authoritative data (type master, type slave).
Put
On 10/5/2010 3:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olseneiv...@aminor.no wrote:
However, another site that _does_ work (with both nameservers on this
host, not just ns1) shows the same thing:
# nslookup ns1.sharingserver.eu 178.63.65.136
Server:
On 10/6/2010 11:44 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/10/10 2:09 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I can find nothing in the documentation that states such. If I missed
it, I'd appreciate someone pointing me at it.
I have some vague memory of seeing messages to that effect when using it
on a
On 10/11/2010 2:44 PM, Nuno Paquete wrote:
Ok, but you can always browse by IP address and in this case there is
no DNS server than can stop you from browsing what you want.
If you want to block IP address access you have to use firewall, or if
you are talking about http traffic and have a
PTR RRs benefit from label compression, whereas TXT records do not.
Therefore I prefer PTR records for any such metadata references within
DNS. There's no chance they'll be mistaken for, or conflict with reverse
DNS records if they're not in the in-addr.arpa branch of the namespace.
On 11/10/2010 3:17 PM, J. Thomsen wrote:
Is there a way or option to configure bind to do the following logic: If the
bind didn’t find a entry in a view 1 (internal view) it will search this
entry on the view 2 (external view) ?
Not to my knowledge. We had the same problem and ended up with
What you're suggesting is not really the inverse of forward first.
Forward first is basically: (try forwarding) - [TIMEOUT FROM ALL
FORWARDERS] - (try iterative resolution)
The inverse would be: (try iterative resolution) - [TIMEOUT FROM ALL
AUTHORITATIVE NAMESERVERS] - (try forwarding)
But
On 11/10/2010 1:19 PM, Maria Iano wrote:
We are working with a software vendor whose software only works with relative
hostnames - they say it can't cope with a fully-qualified domain name. They
want us to make sure the necessary domain is in all clients' search lists. Does
anyone have any
Alans,
I think you're mixing up the resolver function with the
hosting function. With some development and implementation, you can
offer your customers the ability to set up and maintain their own
domains on one nameserver instance, and then have another instance set
up for them
On 11/10/2010 7:23 PM, J. Thomsen wrote:
Not sure why you felt it necessary to resort to hosts files.
Well, I don't know how to configure ressource records in an include file and
don't want to
waste gigabytes of RAM duplicating zones.
If your main concern is resource consumption, maybe you
On 11/11/2010 7:55 AM, J. Thomsen wrote:
If your main concern is resource consumption, maybe you should focus on
developing some clever algorithm by which named could keep track of
multiple references to the same data, without actually having to make
separate copies of the data. Kind of a
On 11/11/2010 1:22 PM, J. Thomsen wrote:
From a nameserver implementation and maintenance perspective, it's even
simpler for the data to already be present in the first view that
matches. Why complicate things more than that?
Because there is a need for it especially in large installations
On 11/18/2010 4:10 PM, Russell Jackson wrote:
On 11/18/2010 12:19 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 11/18/2010 1:36 PM, CT wrote:
I am looking for a best practices for dns query logging
Versions in use on Linux...
- BIND 9.7.1-P2
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
The minimum logging
On 11/21/2010 3:57 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to return a catchall A record for
domains which bind can't resolve?
I'm able to configure a catchall bind configuration where bind would
return the same A record for all queries; but I'd rather it returns it
You should have been able to use nsupdate or some other DDNS client tool
to add that NS record less disruptively than you did.
Understand that rndc freeze doesn't cause updates received in the
interim to be queued in some private area and applied later -- it causes
them to be *refused* and
On 12/7/2010 5:31 PM, David A. Evans wrote:
I'm in the mood to prove a point. I have a very poorly
written application that is generating a few hundred queries per
second of completely bogus records before attempting a lookup of
the correct A records. This is because the
It's really more of an OS tuning question, isn't it?
The usage pattern of a BIND instance is:
a) not much writing of master zone files or journal files unless Dynamic
Update is enabled and the frequency of updates is relatively high,
b) not much writing of slave/stub zone files or journal
The answers will be cached regardless of the setting of the AA flag. I
would suspect that most -- or at least a large percentage -- of DNS
queries made by endpoint clients are to upstream resolvers which don't
happen to be authoritative for the zone(s) in question, so AA=0 is very
common in
On 1/25/2011 9:40 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
I'm reading the document Secure DNS Deployment Guide got from the
URL a poster gave in the list.
The document said:
When a user types the URL www.example.com into a Web browser, the
browser program contacts a type of resolver called a stub
The document is a little sloppy. In addition to the mis-description of
the DNS resolver algorithm, already noted in a previous post, the part
in Section 8.1.2 about restricting zone transfers -- These restrictions
address [...] potential exploits from unrestricted dissemination of
information
On 1/28/2011 5:11 AM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-01-28 10:52 bangla desh napisał(a):
I believed so that com.bd is broken. It only has 1 ns server and
hsbc.com.bd, whois.com.bd and even google.com.bd they are all delegate
directly from bd and not from com.bd.
I am wondering, is there a dns
Vyto,
Dotted hostnames is a term coined by certain limited
DNS-management tools that strive to split up fully-qualified DNS names
into a hostname part and a zone (sometimes referred to as domain)
part. If one chooses to extend a given name for 2 or more labels below
the
So, let me see if I have this correctly: you think that DNS architects
and/or planners should constrain their choices with respect to namespace
layout and/or delegation hierarchy, because of some minor performance
considerations, based on your _speculations_ (without any hard evidence)
about
On 2/8/2011 9:15 AM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8 Matus UHLAR - fantomasuh...@fantomas.sk:
On 08.02.11 17:40, Terry. wrote:
Can BIND's file command referer to more than one zone file?
For example,
zone test.nsbeta.info {
type master;
file a.db;
file b.db;
On 2/23/2011 4:08 AM, babu dheen wrote:
Hi,
Our setup is; We have internal DNS server wherein BIND is configured
in RHEL 5 and many internal zones are configured. if Internet
connection is down, our Internal DNS severs are not able to get the
DNS query from ISP DNS server. Because of this,
On 2/23/2011 4:57 AM, Eivind Olsen wrote:
is there any option in BIND to give priority to HOST file before
connecting it to internet ISP or local zone?
No. BIND doesn't read/use the hosts file.
What you _can_ do is configure BIND to believe it's authoritative for
those zones, but I'd not
There are multiple ways to interpret that question.
Normally, a resolver either uses recursion (with a preconfigured set of
forwarders) at a given point in resolving a particular name, or it
follows the NS records in a delegation chain, non-recursively, in order
to find the answer.
It
I got a trouble ticket on this too.
From the looks of things, Cisco is using GSSes to load-balance this
site. GSSes return SERVFAIL if all of the resources behind the
load-balancer are down (which it determines via a heartbeat mechanism).
So I think this is a simple case of a website (or
See my other post. This is designed-in behavior for Cisco GSSes, since
there is no service unavailable, try again later RCODE.
On 3/2/2011 10:34 AM, David Sparro wrote:
On 3/1/2011 5:27 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
See my other post. This is designed-in behavior for Cisco GSSes, since
there is no service unavailable, try again later RCODE.
When the question is what is the ip address of 'foo' an answer of
the web server
On 3/1/2011 6:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4d6d7268.1080...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
I got a trouble ticket on this too.
From the looks of things, Cisco is using GSSes to load-balance this
site. GSSes return SERVFAIL if all of the resources behind the
load-balancer are down
On 3/7/2011 6:36 AM, Diezig Adrian wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning answers from DNS servers, when I query a
name with type any and the name is a CNAME.
I have the following example (works also in Internet) with an ISC BIND
server (BIND 9.7.0-P1):
; DiG
On 3/9/2011 8:32 AM, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
Hello,
I am currently running BIND 9.6.1-P3 and it works fine. My question is
regarding the db.cache file. I am only running a local domain
(apps.local) that does not access the internet for resolution. My
current root hints file is from Internic.
On 3/9/2011 1:09 PM, Matt Rae wrote:
Hi, I'm working on setting up a slave dns server. Dots have
historically been used in the hostnames here.
What does the term hostname mean to you?
If hostname is defined as the contents of the first label of a
dot-delimited DNS name, then dot in hostname
On 4/5/2011 8:23 AM, iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Hi,
can i make priority on a A or NS record? Since with round robin if i
put the same record record 2 or 3 time, Bind ignore the duplicates
Records, means
this:
wikipediaNSns2.wikimedia.org.
wikipediaNSns0.wikimedia.org.
is the
A. Stop using nslookup. It's a really horrible DNS troubleshooting tool.
Learn to use dig.
B. Do a zone transfer (via dig) of the united-networks.ru zone from the
primary master, to verify that the correct delegation record, and
associated glue, are contained within named's in-core database of
Mistake #1: looking up something using a shortname. Apparently
rac2.local is not in your stub resolver's local search list. Always
use fully-qualified domain names (FQDNs) for client lookups, and educate
your users to do so also. Using FQDNs is the most efficient, least
ambiguous, and
On 4/8/2011 2:42 PM, John Wobus wrote:
All the previously-mentioned issues apply, but (obviously)
round robin could be made to offer a select server twice as
often by giving that server an additional address and
A record. Something similar for nameservers could
be devised.
Mostly unnecessary
On 4/11/2011 7:18 AM, kapetr wrote:
Hello,
interesting ...
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: Stacey Marshallstacey.marsh...@gmail.com
Komu: kapetrkap...@mizera.cz
Předmět: Re: BIND9 fails resolving after connecting to VPN
Datum: 9.4.2011 - 22:50:44
I' wondering if the network your attaching to
On 4/8/2011 10:56 AM, jeffreyp wrote:
greetings,
is there a way to programmatically determine if there are any zones
frozen? if so, any way to determine the specific zone(s)?
what i'm wanting to do is write a monitoring script to sound an alert if
there are any zones that have been frozen for
On 4/12/2011 4:33 AM, kapetr wrote:
Hello,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com WROTE:
Do You thing, that this VPN provider
- blocks direct (not recursive) DNS questions
and
- manipulates recursive queries ? [catch them,
make query itself and
answers with manipulated server IP]
???
None of your
On 4/17/2011 2:49 PM, Ben Croswell wrote:
In the bind 8 days people would put the same address multiple times
and then other addresses as well to weight the responses.
-Ben Croswell
On Apr 17, 2011 2:45 PM, Eivind Olsen eiv...@aminor.no
mailto:eiv...@aminor.no wrote:
Hi,
we have
I'd like to reinforce what Chris said, and recommend the use of an
internal root zone for networks/enterprises which have no public
Internet connectivity, or whose connectivity to the Internet is
exclusively through application-level proxies. Don't make Internet names
resolvable on your
On 4/21/2011 10:17 AM, Flex Banana wrote:
hello list,
I use dhcpd-4.2.1 with bind-9.7.3 on a SuSE system.
I have 3 network cards with under 700 differents subnets declared in the
dhcpd.conf.
eth0 = 10.1.1.50
eth1 = 172.16.1.50
eth2 = 192.168.1.50
We use Dynamic DNS
On 5/2/2011 9:50 PM, Jeff Pang wrote:
2011/5/3 Jeff Pangjeffrp...@gmail.com:
2011/5/3 Chris Thompsonc...@cam.ac.uk:
It will need to know the addresses of ns1.def.com ns2.def.com to
send them NOTIFY packets when the zone is updated (unless that has
been suppressed). But it gets those by (if
On 5/6/2011 6:40 AM, iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Thanks for the answer but:
*
In the example i post yesterday: on my server1 the recursion is
enabled (recursion yes), but the server1 can't recurse because i
stop it on firewall and it can't contact the outside.
On 5/12/2011 3:21 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello CT,
Am 2011-05-12 13:09:35, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Primary Name server
bind- 9.7.3
OS- CentOS 5.6
Authoritative for 2 zones using DNSSEC
This may be an obvious question but I will ask anyway.. :)
I want to change the name
This is why people run separate views, separate instances, or separate
devices for DNS resolution (= recursive, by necessity) versus DNS
hosting (= non-recursive, best practice). If you run both hosting and
resolution on the same nameserver instance but different views, you may
need to be a
On 5/25/2011 9:21 AM, Niobos wrote:
On 2011-05-24 21:58, Warren Kumari wrote:
On May 24, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Igor da Silva Cagnin wrote:
I have a doubt about querys, as fact I’d like to deny just querys
type MX. Other querys types must be available. Is it possible?
Yes.
1: Don't list the MX
On 5/26/2011 2:51 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:
Hi,
A question regarding BIND defaults. I'd love the same answer for other
nameserver software if anyone
cares to share.
I am a recursive nameserver. I am looking for foo.bar.com. i've learned from
bar.com that foo.bar.com has
four NS records. I've
even get me started on car commercials. I've seen a few that
never even made it to the public eye :-)
On 5/30/2011 8:18 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4de42bef.3050...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
Get back to us when you prove that this co-exists with DNSSEC; otherwise
it's a non-starter
On 5/31/2011 2:38 PM, Supersonic wrote:
I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server.
Doing what, exactly? Resolving internal names only? Resolving Internet
names? Acting as an authoritative server for internal clients? Internet
clients? Some combination of the
On 6/5/2011 9:07 AM, Peter Andreev wrote:
Hi
I'm puzzled a little - i see in my zone glue records with
link-local addresses. I think it is not good, but no rfc mentions
about link-local in glue.
Could someone tell me best practices for link-local in glue?
Well, some things are so obvious
On 6/12/2011 4:00 PM, Rodrigo Faria Tavares wrote:
Hello,
I installed bind in CentOS release 5.6 (Final).
My DNS Server not ping alias (with cname), so the steps:
I installed this packages:
[root@centos ~]# rpm -qa | grep bind
ypbind-1.19-12.el5
bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5
On 6/15/2011 4:06 PM, abushla...@ies.etisalat.ae wrote:
What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any difference
between the two ?
Thanks Regards
-Original Message-
From: Eivind Olseneiv...@aminor.no
Sender:
On 6/15/2011 7:41 PM, M. Meadows wrote:
The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver
mismatch is working as expected. Here's some of the feedback we
received from them when we questioned the setup:
~
We use load balancers for the majority of our
On 6/20/2011 7:04 AM, Vignesh Gadiyar wrote:
What do the client.c and server.c programs in the /bin/named do?
They're not programs, they're C source files in the BIND distribution:
% ls bin/named/client.c bin/named/server.c
bin/named/client.c bin/named/server.c
%
As part of the build
On 6/18/2011 12:08 AM, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
Hi!
I have set up a view for one site. It is bound to change answers as
necessary for different IP-ranges. It works as far as I could see.
But with one ip-range there is a problem ...
I can query internal addresses:
!user@kvm2~# host
On 6/17/2011 8:01 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 17/06/11 12:10, Andrew Benton wrote:
And it works well for every domain on the internet. Except for
www.nhs.uk - I can't resolve nhs.uk
www.nhs.uk is, currently, a CNAME to
www.prod.nhs.uk.akadns.net
You might be suffering from the bind 9.8 CNAME
On 6/22/2011 7:26 AM, Eric Yiu wrote:
Hi,
I am using bind9.7.3-P1 with solaris10x86. I notice that
sometimes our bind server will reply servfail when querying
a zone aws.amazon.com http://aws.amazon.com which is expiring, while
this
aws.amazon.com http://aws.amazon.com only 60sec cache
On 6/23/2011 4:27 PM, Stefan Certic wrote:
Thanks Chuck
Yes, that would be a solution, but i need logs processed through syslog and
stored into database (matching the initial query from query log).
Pharsing tcpdump is not going to be suitable for highly loaded system. I was
more looking for a
On 7/5/2011 12:28 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:29 AM, vrbind-u...@iotk.net wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to visit http://communities.intel.com; using Iceweasel on a
Debian desktop PC. No proxies.
My clients etc/resolv.conf point to my own Debian BIND 9.7.3 installed on a
was normally Cyclic. The
result was that only the answer section records were getting sorted in
the random order and all other records were cyclic. Is this the
behavior if we set order to any order we want.
-Vignesh.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
mailto:k
On 7/7/2011 1:50 AM, Torinthiel wrote:
On 07/07/11 04:56, pa...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello,
I got two different forms of AUTHORITY SECTION from the dig, for example,
$ dig mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
; DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;;
On 7/8/2011 3:04 AM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Jul 7, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Feng He wrote:
2011/7/8 Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com:
I think it's worth emphasizing that in the first case, the contents of the
Authority Section were *mandatory* (see RFC 2308, Negative Caching), whereas
in the second case
On 7/8/2011 12:11 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
It should be possible to set up an authoritative-only name server so
that it does not recurse for anyone [except perhaps itself], but still
allow someone to get a full resolution of a name whose canonical name is
elsewhere. IMHBUCO.
I started with
On 7/11/2011 2:11 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
The number of DNS queries required for each address lookup requested
by a client has gone up considerably because of IPV6. The problem is
being exacerbated by the fact that many DNS servers on the net don't
yet support IPV6 queries. The result is
On 7/13/2011 2:35 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 07/13/2011 02:13 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Well, all the prodding from people here prompted me to investigate
further exactly what's going on. The problem isn't what I thought it
was. It appears to be a bug in glibc, and I've filed a bug report and
On 7/13/2011 1:06 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 7/13/2011 2:35 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 07/13/2011 02:13 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Well, all the prodding from people here prompted me to investigate
further exactly what's going on. The problem isn't what I thought it
was. It appears to be a bug
On 7/13/2011 2:39 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I agree that the order of the A/ responses shouldn't matter to the
result. The whole getaddrinfo() call should fail regardless of whether
the failure is seen first or the valid response is seen first. Why?
Because getaddrinfo() should, if it
On 7/18/2011 11:42 PM, AMANI MOHAMED BIN SUWAIF wrote:
Hi,
I have the below scenario
_TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV1005060primary-sbg.example.com
_TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV2005060
secondary-sbg.example.com
I have 2 IP ranges and 2 SBGs host, my intention is
for
records.
Thanks Regards,
*Amani*
On 7/20/2011 2:50 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 7/18/2011 11:42 PM, AMANI MOHAMED BIN SUWAIF wrote:
Hi,
I have the below scenario
_TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV1005060
primary-sbg.example.com
_TCP.EXAMPLE.COMIN SRV2005060
On 7/24/2011 2:15 AM, Vbvbrj wrote:
options {
allow-transfer { none; };
recursion yes;
forward first;
forwarders { a.b.c.d; }; // Forward to providers dns.
};
zone my_domain.com IN {
type forward;
forward only;
forwarders { a.b.c.d; }; // Forward to Windows DNS.
};
I would like
On 7/25/2011 6:14 AM, harish badrinath wrote:
(Originally sent to bind-workers, sorry if this is considered cross
posting. Slightly modified from the original message)
Hello,
I am using Bind version:BIND 9.7.1-P2
I am doing some small internal changes to bind and i have to know when
a query
On 7/25/2011 10:22 AM, Sathyan Arjunan (sarjunan) [CONTRACTOR] wrote:
Recent days, I am facing frequent caching issues with my DNS servers
which are responsible for recursive lookup to external queries. As a
temporary solution, we used to refresh the named daemon to clear the
cache. To
On 7/28/2011 12:26 PM, CT wrote:
I am wondering what might be a good workaround for this
legacy setup...
Will do my best to explain..
IP Space
- 1 Class B Global Unique (used Externally and Internally)
- 1 Class B RFC1918
DNS Setup
External DNS (Linux - Bind 9.8.x)
- example-ext.com
On 9/1/2011 7:57 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4e5fb1ab.4040...@data.pl, Torinthiel writes:
On 09/01/11 17:56, Tom Schmitt wrote:
=20
I found the cause of my problem (and a solution):
=20
dig +trace actually has another behaviour than doing the trace manually=
step by step with dig.
Why are you trying to use the SRAA for DNS resolution? SRAA has a
special meaning to network-infrastructure devices; I don't think it was
ever intended for anycasting general network services. Just pick one of
your global-unicast address, and anycast that instead.
There was an old
On 9/6/2011 8:40 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4e66b5b5.30...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 9/1/2011 7:57 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4e5fb1ab.4040...@data.pl, Torinthiel writes:
On 09/01/11 17:56, Tom Schmitt wrote:
=20
I found the cause of my problem (and a solution):
=20
On 9/14/2011 5:52 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
The second part however seems to go more to my question, which is What is
the resolver supposed to do when some knucklehead breaks the rules and puts
a CNAME in with some other stuff?
Depends on
Are you talking about recursive clients failing over?
Or other nameservers trying to talk to yours, non-recursively?
Recursive clients don't use NS records at all and you need to approach
the failover problem in a completely different way (e.g. relying on the
client failing over from one
The name goyello.com *itself* owns no SRV records. You never added any
with that name.
host doesn't have any special knowledge of SRV records, and, besides,
you didn't tell it what service and protocol, so it didn't even have
enough information to construct the appropriate name to look up.
) to my DNS server in firewall or i just need to
allow DNS traffic only from ISP DNS server
ISP DNS server configuration
mycompany-dns-server-ip INA 10.10.10.10
mail.myoffice.com INNSmycompany dns server ip
Regards
Papdheen M
*From:* Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
*To:* bind-users
On 9/21/2011 5:00 PM, TMK wrote:
I have couple of questions.
bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit.
i'm running the x64 bit version.
You can _try_ to raise that limit above 4Gb (see the various
configuration elements under Operating System Resource
On 9/20/2011 5:08 AM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
I got 4 DNSs doing recursive resolution, which splited into 2 groups,
and a couple of dns caches. Each group of recursion DNS using their
own net link, which is different.
Here's problem: I want a dns-cache to use one group of recursion DNS
as their
On 9/21/2011 10:01 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
Why are you going through all of these gyrations? The forwarding algorithm
in BIND has for a long time been based on RTT, so if one forwarder, or a set
of forwarders, stops working, the other(s) will be used automatically. In
other words, forwarder
On 9/22/2011 6:03 AM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
Oops, I misunderstood. But I want to resolve this problem: take
news.qq.com for example, I DID saw that it's unresolvable to one group
(they returned NXDomain), at meantime it's no problem to another
group, and dig news.qq.com +trace returned correct
On 10/4/2011 12:40 PM, Pablo Maurelli wrote:
hello, pick up a dns server with bind9, is resolving claims, but
it takes time to resolve a lot, sometimes throw timeout error and
the second time resolved, any ideas?
I pass below my named.conf, host.conf and nsswitch.conf
On 10/10/2011 11:13 AM, enigmedia wrote:
On 10/10/2011 9:26 AM, Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP wrote:
If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will
take care of some broken DNS packages.
Hth
Thanks, I had googled around a bit and saw some conflicting opinions
On 10/11/2011 1:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t
have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single
NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
Well, there is other software I was
On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're
running a modern OS), and is probably
On 10/12/2011 1:21 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Many years ago, various flavors of unix began distributing a
utility called host which did almost the same thing as nslookup.
Host is what I use most of the time, now, and I actually thought
that nslookup on unix systems was maybe going away.
On 10/12/2011 5:46 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
On 12/10/11 22:33, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Sten Carlsenst...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
Use dig.
Always use dig.
I don't quite agree, for debugging bind, use dig - for debugging lookup
issues on some machine, host will
On 10/28/2011 12:48 PM, Laws, Peter C. wrote:
It seems like there are two ways I could delegate a zone.
I could, in the zone file for the parent, simply list the name of the zone
and a number of NS records to which the zone has been delegated.
Or, I could create a zone statement within
On 10/31/2011 6:58 AM, Kristen Eisenberg wrote:
Ben Croswell writes:
In that case technically you are creating undelegated subdomains for
each
router.
The dot is a delimiter and can't be part of a hostname.
I was thinking you are wrong.
Period is somewhat permitted in a hostname.
On 11/8/2011 4:39 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.11.11 20:27, trm asn wrote:
I have one domain example.com
[...]
*testINNSns1973.hostgator.com.
testINNSns1974.hostgator.com.*
[...]
what are these supposed to mean?
After commenting out below entries rndc
On 11/11/2011 4:30 AM, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
Thanks a lot Mark.
But I don't understand the calculation part.
Is there any source available from which I can get detail information
regarding the same??
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurav Kansal
9910118448
-Original Message-
From: Mark
201 - 300 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
