Re: per-zone-recursion?

2010-10-07 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Kalman Feher wrote: probably it was not thought because it's wrong. This point is getting religious now, IMHO. Bear in mind that your rationale is based on getting an inaccessible DNS server to return information that a client has correctly

Re: per-zone-recursion?

2010-10-01 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:25:31AM +0200, Kalman Feher wrote: Yes. To explain my setup further, there is a view based on src-IPs for some clients, where recursion is turned on. The rest of the world gets non-recursive answers, e.g. with authoritative data, or refused. In case of that

Re: per-zone-recursion?

2010-10-01 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 01.10.10 12:39, Joerg Dorchain wrote: Well, I could agree agree that wrong means not thought of by RfC-Designers and bind implementators (yet). probably it was not thought because it's wrong. This point

per-zone-recursion?

2010-09-30 Thread Joerg Dorchain
Hello, I am puzzled with a bind config for a kind of dns-reverse-proxy situation. I have a server with only one public IP addresse, bind running on port 53 of it. This bind serves examples.net. A subdomain dynsub.example.net should be served on some other software answering DNS request with