address = 212.119.93.5
When I enable the logs for xfer, it doesn't give any clue of problem name
server of medun.net.sa.
Is there any way to troubleshoot from the master server why there is no
synchnization to one more Slave.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Mohammed Ejaz
Asst. Operation
I am using bind I have problem in resolving my domain cyberia.net.sa over
the internet. Whereas it is working fine internally. Any clue would be
highly appeicated.
Thanks,
Mohammed Ejaz
Asst. Operation Director of Systems.
Cyberia SAUDI ARABIA
P.O.Box: 301079, Riyadh 11372
Phone: (+966
to do in a firewall with a temporary rule.
On 18/12/2017 14:54, Mohammed Ejaz wrote:
Thank you for the detail explanation really appreciated .
We have asked by our National cyber Security Center to investigate on this,
as they have detected massive malicious requests from our DNS
hich suggests they have something to hide. I don't get the
vibe that this domain is owned by a child or someone who needs protection from
the evilness of the Internet...
On 18/12/2017 11:26, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.12.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Mohammed Ejaz:
>> Hell
ing
ns2.mumbai-m.site/: reply has no answer
Dec 17 09:58:41 ns20 named[1530]: DNS format error from 46.105.221.247#53
resolv ing
ns1.mumbai-m.site/: reply has no answer
Thanks,
Mohammed Ejaz
Asst. Operation Director
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:41 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: unable-resolving (Mohammed Ejaz)
Hi there,
... we have been receiving complain from our customer that they are
unable to open the websites when they use our DNS server ...
Does your server allow your customer to make
Dear all.
This lately we have been receiving complain from our customer that they are
unable to open the websites when they use our DNS server
(ns1.cyberia.net.sa) , one of the Eg. Is www.twitter.com, it works only If
I removed my internal cache it works for some time. And after some time
yes, true the problem is from the firewall.
Thanks everyone for the tremendous support.
Ejaz
From: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:09 PM
To: Mohammed Ejaz
Cc: Barry Margolin; comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Re: can't-resolve
have worked with this IP if there is firewall on the box??
Regards,
Mohammed Ejaz
CYBERIAR SAUDI ARABIA
P.O.Box 301079, Riyadh 11372, Saudi Arabia
Tel: +966 11 464 7114 Ext. 140
Fax: +966 11 465 4735
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun
Subject: Re: can't-resolve
On 25 December 2014 at 08:05, Mohammed Ejaz me...@cyberia.net.sa wrote:
logging {
channel querylog{
file /var/log/querylog;
severity debug 10;
print-category yes;
print-time yes
...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Steven Carr
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 5:54 PM
To: Bind users
Subject: Re: can't-resolve
On 25 December 2014 at 14:50, Mohammed Ejaz me...@cyberia.net.sa wrote:
I wanted tell you one more thing when I reassign my old IP which is
212.119.64.12 then everything works fine (I
hello,
I cannot resolve the external domain when I change my name server IP.I
am sure for the new IP (which I am replacing with existing IP) the port 53
udp and TCP is enabled for publically.
also modifying in the named.conf in the listening section such as
listen-on port 53
, 2014 4:54 PM
To: Bind users
Subject: Re: can't-resolve
On 24 December 2014 at 13:42, Mohammed Ejaz me...@cyberia.net.sa wrote:
Any clue would be highly appreciated. thanks in advance.
What's the name of the zone so we can test from here?
Did you update the parent zone to tell it the nameserver IP
Thank you for prompt support really appreciate.
my /etc/named.conf, see recursion are enabled. still I can resolve the
yahoo.com or any outside domains.
=
set debug
yahoo.com
Server: 212.119.64.228
Address:212.119.64.228#53
I have info blox DNS appliance and slave is BIND
9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4, now the problem is Zone transfer
wont happening when I am enabling Tsig key at master server of infoblox.
It gives you the error like client request has invalid signature tsig
tranfer: tisg verify
I have a primary and secondary name server which host a number of domains.
Recently, the secondary has started failing to sync one of the domains, and
comes up with the following
May 7 22:51:12 ns2 named[1381]: [ID 873579 daemon.error] transfer of
'domain.com/IN' from
Thank you so much for your immediate answer, I wanted know how did you check
as 212.93.192.4 configured only on UDP?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 10:33 AM
To: Mohammed Ejaz
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: No-Sync-at-Slave
Hi,
Since we are one of the leading ISP and Domain service provider in the KSA,,
in our DNS we have about 1000 domains are hosted, Now actually my concern is
regarding the DNSSEC deployment,
Since I went through with several articles, stating that it is not that
much needed for the
We have been receiving complain by our client, during the primary DNS
servers are down that is ns1.xyz and ns2.xyz is down. And as per the
configuration at saudinic.net.sa (domain Registrar Company) we were
expecting that during the outage of primary name servers then ns3.abc will
handle all the
Hi,
I am sysadmin of one of the leading ISPs of Saudi Arabia, I am going to
upgrade the bind which is from BIND 9.3.4-P1 to the latest one, so please
can any one confirm that the latest BIND 9.6.0-P1 can be helpful in ISP's
environment. As I have experienced some issues earlier when I
Hi all,
Can it be possible through the bind, www records should work as failover, I
mean during the primary record unavailable and then it should go for next
www only, Pls. note that I don't want let they work as round robin function.
1. Primary www record pointing 1.2.3.4 as long as it
TTL.
Philippe
_
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mohammed Ejaz
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 8:11 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Failover
Hi all,
Can it be possible through the bind, www records
22 matches
Mail list logo
