This is a question about the operating system, not BIND.
There are a number of ways. You can enable rollbacks in RPM, you can keep
snaphots... you're not going to run into incompatible upgrades in BIND during a
simple patching.
--
*Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health
*Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS |-*O*-
||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
|| \\ and Health | novos...@rutgers.edumailto:novos...@rutgers.edu-
973/972.0922 (2x0922)
|| \\ Sciences |
OS X/iOS autocorrect doesn't work well for technology conversations, period.
It's always changing words and acronyms to other things more interesting. I
swear it waits till the moment you hit send.
--
*Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS
Looks like finding who is authoritative foothillfiretraining.org and then doing
a reverse lookup on an address.
From: Samad Agha [mailto:samad.agha2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 04:33 PM
To: DNS BIND bind-us...@isc.org; bind-users@lists.isc.org
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2013 10:18 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message blu172-w413284a8b9811729dbc1d6d3...@phx.gbl,
=?iso-8859-1?B?RuFiaW 8gR29tZXM=?= writes:
Hi,
We are in a process to upgrade a really old server running an
old Linux distro with Bind 9.2.1.
No -- and it's not BIND, it's the DNS spec. Reverse entries are in the
.in-addr.arpa domian, not your domain name.
- Original Message -
From: Eduardo Bonsi [mailto:beart...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 01:26 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2013 11:23 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article
mailman.736.1372773195.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Steven
Carr sjc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 July 2013 14:42, Sam Wilson sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Can anyone here give examples of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2013 04:39 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 02.07.13 08:53, Daniel McDonald wrote:
I've had trouble with OSI-Soft PI historian without reverse
entries. If there is no reverse, then the PI software would
spend about 30 seconds looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2013 11:33 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/03/2013 07:52 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote: | On 07/03/2013
04:39 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: | On 02.07.13 08:53,
Daniel McDonald wrote: | I've had trouble with OSI-Soft PI
historian without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2013 12:36 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:42 +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software
that will not operate without a PTR record?
Nope, and our entire reverse zone was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The short answer is some software once cared. Does it still now, I'm
not sure. But we do it.
On 06/28/2013 01:56 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for
a zone? I have asked some of the admins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2013 03:47 PM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) wrote:
And the 100-dollar-question is: How do you remove them on
outgoing mails? ;-)
You don't -- that's part of the churches evangelism / outreach
effort.
;)
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 01:37 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Re: any requests
In article mailman.424.1370323734.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Novosielski, Ryan novos...@umdnj.edu wrote:
If it were not already in the cache, I would not need
Not in my experience -- in fact, I often do an ANY query to refresh the cache.
From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cli...@buxtonfamily.us]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 08:47 PM
To: Leonard Mills l...@yahoo.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: any requests
If you have
,
Novosielski, Ryan novos...@umdnj.edu wrote:
Not in my experience -- in fact, I often do an ANY query to refresh the
cache.
That will work if the name is not currently in the cache -- the caching
server will query the auth server, and get everything from there.
But if it already has the name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I personally use localdomain. I'm not sure how safe it is, but I use
it at home so it probably doesn't matter.
On 05/08/2013 01:47 PM, Steven Carr wrote:
You could ask your institution for a subdomain to be reserved from
their domain?
.lan isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/08/2013 01:28 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
From: Steven Carr sjc...@gmail.com
Any chance someone can correct the settings on this mailing list
to reply to the list by default instead of the user posting the
message?
Why, Are the settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2013 09:47 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.59.1365230565.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Sam Wilson sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
[adding an A record for ed.ac.uk.]
If your AD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2013 10:16 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 08/04/13 14:46, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article
mailman.59.1365230565.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Phil
Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Sam Wilson sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
[adding an A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2013 04:12 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2013-04-05 12:18, Sam Wilson wrote:
We're currently prevaricating over putting in an A record for
ed.ac.uk. Whilst my colleagues who manage active directory assure
me that having an A record there -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/2013 03:11 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/05/2013 11:53 PM, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
| It is funny you should mention that... my questions about using
views | to create a situation where one single record is different
happens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/15/2013 07:11 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:56:57PM -0400, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
Hi all. Running BIND 9.6 I believe it is. Not important what
version as if there is a version that can do this and I'm not
running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/2013 01:05 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:24:24PM -0400, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
...
One followup question to this: are there any limits to how the
SOA section is handled in this case? Can the SOA record
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niall already answered you the other day (brackets mine):
The reply to such a query [from your server] originates from port 53
on the remote server, and is destined for the port on your server
which was used as the source of the query[, which will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It sounds like exactly the reverse of what Niall described in his
other e-mail (brackets mine):
The reply to such a query originates from port 53 on the remote
server [in this case, your server], and is destined for the port on
your server [in this
I have no idea how things work on Windows, but I doubt directory is optional.
- Original Message -
From: Joanne Homier [mailto:joanne.hom...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:30 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Having trouble setting up BIND
Hi all. Running BIND 9.6 I believe it is. Not important what version as if
there is a version that can do this and I'm not running it, I can go there.
Is it possible to have a view that is in essence a list of exceptions to the
main zone? eg. the example.com domain exists, so does
Thanks! Wonderful -- asked and answered.
- Original Message -
From: Joseph S D Yao [mailto:j...@tux.org]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 07:11 PM
To: Novosielski, Ryan
Cc: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Can two views be layered?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06
Could we knock off the politics please? I view the recent few posts as ignorant
nonsense (complete with poor spelling AND Ayn Rand -- a twofer!), but I'm not
inclined to take us further off topic by responding to it.
From: Shawn Bakhtiar [mailto:shashan...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February
I personally like NameCheap. Cheap, and good documentation (that you can use
even if you go with someone else).
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:r...@htt-consult.com]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 03:32 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I don't know if there's an easy, or even moderately easy way to do
this, but can one somehow figure out/get a list of all domains for
which the nameserver is set to a given IP/server name? For reasons I
won't get into, the people who register
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2012 06:45 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Registrars are expected to have both a billing/admin contact and a
technical contact; make sure that people who expect you to make
their domains work put you as the tech contact, and you will at
least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2012 06:52 PM, Dan Mahoney wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know if there's an easy, or even moderately easy way to
do this, but can one somehow figure out/get a list of all domains
for which the nameserver is set to a given IP/server name? For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 09:40 AM, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
'.local is the 4th most queried domain name (after localhost, com
and net), but it should not exist at all in the Internet (or
queries should not reach the root server system). You see corp,
intern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 11:36 AM, btb wrote:
On 2012.11.15 10.14, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
Failing to operate a private TLD correctly is causing internal
data leaking to the Internet, which could be a security risk
but in all cases is a burden on the root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2012 10:09 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
King, Harold Clyde (Hal) h...@utk.edu wrote:
I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to
keep some hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a
DNS name like host.sub.local.
I think many of us were just curious why someone would even think to disable
it. Would be great if you could indulge (maybe something we've not thought of).
- Original Message -
From: Jack Tavares [mailto:j.tava...@f5.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 06:03 PM
To: c...@cam.ac.uk
While I can see maybe not being interested, caring enough to supress it has me
curious.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Clegg [mailto:a...@clegg.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 06:13 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Disable log message
On Oct 18, 2012,
38 matches
Mail list logo
