Re: designing the DNS from the scratch

2017-07-09 Thread SM
about the requirement as it is not clear what they are looking for. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org

Re: localhoast A record?

2014-03-21 Thread SM
. It still seems to me potentially useful to keep localhost.cam.ac.uk itself, to terminate the probable iteration described above before it goes any further. It can be used to exploit web application vulnerabilities. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit

Re: internal network PTR records, necessary?

2013-08-13 Thread SM
and RFC 6305. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: New warning message...

2013-07-24 Thread SM
Track. RFC 6652 is about ARF. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: PTR files

2013-06-17 Thread SM
Hi Norman, If I recall correctly the initial message you posted mentioned a network connectivity problem. I suggest verifying whether one end can ping the other end. See whether you can ping by IP address and by host name. Regards, -sm

Re: This list's prefix

2013-06-05 Thread SM
Hi Elmar, At 12:27 05-06-2013, Elmar K. Bins wrote: And the 100-dollar-question is: How do you remove them on outgoing mails? ;-) The answer is to edit the subject line after hitting the reply button. :-) Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https

Re: spf ent txt records.

2013-03-18 Thread SM
://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/ Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: Can we load balance traf[f]ic for CNAME records?

2012-12-14 Thread SM
their since I want users to access the both the ISPs to connect. I can have A/CNAME? record See RFC 6186. Verify whether the mail clients support that specification. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: User wanting to use a .local domain to host DNS

2012-11-14 Thread SM
At 07:15 14-11-2012, John Miller wrote: It doesn't look like .local is officially reserved (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606), but .localdomain definitely is. .localdomain is not reserved. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org

Re: How to Setup DNSSEC

2012-10-17 Thread SM
, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Question related to domain names and less to bind straight.

2012-09-05 Thread SM
suffix list for an informal lower level break-down. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: cache does truely in local and doesn't work in remote

2012-09-02 Thread SM
, you did the following: root@debian:/home/mohsen# dig yahoo.com @184.22.226.206 Verify the IP address you should be using for DNS. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind

Re: Question about connections to BIND and tcp 443

2012-08-22 Thread SM
At 07:38 22-08-2012, Moore, Mark A. wrote: from connecting to 443 since these servers are only DNS. Is there any reason for clients to connect to tcp 443 for any type of DNS resolution? Just want to confirm before I dig deeper into this issue. No. Regards, -sm

Re: dns_query_createvia: failed address not available

2012-08-19 Thread SM
file? Is the IP address bound to one of the available interfaces? Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org

Re: Weird stuff with one host... :-S

2012-07-16 Thread SM
clause. See example at http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.8/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2590162 Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users

Re: Operation Cancelled Error

2012-07-12 Thread SM
thread at https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2011-June/084405.html The question might be what is the maximum QPS handled on hardware similar to the one you used for the test. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman

Re: Operation Cancelled Error

2012-07-11 Thread SM
/ configuration required to bind? I am using google public dns ips as forwarder in named.conf Are you doing load testing on Google's DNS server? Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Re: VMware Bind

2012-06-05 Thread SM
Hi John, At 09:58 05-06-2012, Manson, John wrote: Will bind run on VMware? Yes, if the guest operating system supports it. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users

Re: Clarification on wildcard falls into glue records

2012-05-15 Thread SM
At 07:08 15-05-2012, Alexander Gurvitz wrote: From wikipedia: To quote RFC 1912, A common mistake is thinking that a wildcard Using Wikipedia to quote RFC 1912 is odd ... Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: query issue

2012-03-29 Thread SM
: ;; ANSWER SECTION: kingstonmass.org. 3600IN NS mns02.domaincontrol.com. kingstonmass.org. 3600IN NS mns01.domaincontrol.com. ns1.gis.net and ns2.gis.net return a different answer. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit

Re: DLZ provider other than a database?

2011-12-20 Thread SM
for, but (for a variety of reasons) I'd rather not create any sort of static data set for (e.g., zone file, actual db entries, etc.). https://github.com/jpmens/dlz_lua Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Re: Suspecious DNS queries dropped by Firewall

2011-12-14 Thread SM
://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/ Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Suspecious DNS queries dropped by Firewall

2011-12-13 Thread SM
At 04:46 13-12-2011, babu dheen wrote: In what situation, DNS packet size can exceed more than 512 bytes. In fact, my gateway DNS TXT records used for DKIM, for example. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: NXDOMAIN redirection in BIND 9.9

2011-09-30 Thread SM
intrusively -- than BIND 9.9 will. http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1647302 Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https

Re: Weird IPv6 issue?

2011-09-11 Thread SM
.INA ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: s-carlsen.dk.86400INSOAns2.s-carlsen.dk. hostmaster.s-carlsen.dk. 2010123191 10800 900 604800 86400 If the type argument is not supplied, dig will perform a lookup for an A record. dig d6.s-carlsen.dk Regards, -sm

Re: Bug in Bind 9.8 or am I doing something wrong?

2011-09-06 Thread SM
may have read. :-) There is also a proposal for a Special-Use Domain Name (draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01). Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing

Re: [UNsolved] was: what does dig +trace do?

2011-09-02 Thread SM
the system was designed to work and not about what is forbidden. The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952, updated by RFC 1123. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Re: about AUTHORITY SECTION

2011-07-09 Thread SM
be RFC 2308 replaces Section 4.3.4 of RFC 1034. Irrespective of whether it is only at Proposed Standard, it is implemented by BIND 9. Regards, -sm ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind

Re: Bug in bind 9.7.3?

2011-05-26 Thread SM
to assertion failure) Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: continous DNS query to ROOT DNS server

2011-04-25 Thread SM
query towards ROOT DNS servers(192.175.48.1, 192.175.48.6, 192.175.48.42 and etc) See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org

Re: Deny MX queries for dynamic IP pools

2010-01-31 Thread SM
into doing traffic flow analysis and using feedback reports to identify the source of the abuse. Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: CNAME for MX Record?

2009-08-19 Thread SM
. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: meetingtoolsandjewels.com. 1800 IN MX 0 m1.dnsix.com. meetingtoolsandjewels.com. 3600 IN CNAME meetingsmaven.typepad.com. Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https

Re: dig printout doesn't appear to match reality

2009-05-16 Thread SM
. 28800 IN NS dns.mtcnet.net. This is unrelated to your original question. dns.mtcnet.net does not resolve. Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT Illegal

2009-01-25 Thread SM
perception of a requirement (see the MUST return at least one address record in the quoted text). Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT Illegal

2009-01-25 Thread SM
and that was clarified in the latest revision of the specifications. Regards, -sm ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users