Re: Max Cache Objects

2011-09-24 Thread TMK
that your DNS performance issue isn't a cache issue? For example, does your system need to invoke bind with -4? John We have tried so. There is no imorovment. On Sep 21, 2011, at 5:00 PM, TMK wrote: I have couple of questions. bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase

Re: bind-users Digest, Vol 979, Issue 3

2011-09-23 Thread TMK
On Sep 23, 2011 3:06 AM, Chris Buxton chris.p.bux...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:50 PM, TMK wrote: On 9/21/2011 5:00 PM, TMK wrote: I have couple of questions. bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit. i'm running the x64 bit version

Max Cache Objects

2011-09-21 Thread TMK
I have couple of questions. bind cache memory limit is 4GB. can I increase it. or this is hard-coded limit. i'm running the x64 bit version. also to increase the cache hit ratio I have created script to query my dns for the top 1 million sites. would this give any performance advantages or is

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 8, 2011 1:31 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: Message: 1 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 From: TMK eng...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 9, 2011 10:28 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. does your server respond to a.root-servers.net, or does a.root-servers.netrespond to your BIND

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-08 Thread TMK
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: Message: 1 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 From: TMK eng...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID

Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-02 Thread TMK
On Sep 2, 2011 9:48 AM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Leonard Mills l...@yahoo.com Date: Aug 31, 2011 8:15 PM Subject: Re: slow non-cached quries To: TMK eng...@gmail.com ;; Received 738 bytes from 192.112.36.4#53(G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 3133 ms

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-08-31 Thread TMK
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:26 AM, TMK eng...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message CAAKgOtgoifGPNEpHtX7++w=cze1dpxx2degq1ppkz18dpuf...@mail.gmail.com,  TMK writes: Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-08-30 Thread TMK
Tamer Mohamed NOC engineer LinkdotNet On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message CAAKgOtgoifGPNEpHtX7++w=cze1dpxx2degq1ppkz18dpuf...@mail.gmail.com,  TMK writes: Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have

slow non-cached quries

2011-08-29 Thread TMK
Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have slow response time for the non-cached entries. I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result ; DiG 9.8.0-P2 @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd . 2013 IN