Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
>
> Do you think that per (mail) server instances of BIND are worth the additional
> administrative overhead as compared to more central shared instances?
Yes, that's what I did when I was doing mail things. There are a few
reasons: reduce load on the shared
For me, I run one locally per data center with forwarders, etc. defined
but for a "How to spin up your own mail server", I would likely just
keep it to one per mail server.
For someone more advanced, DNS is lightweight and anti-spam is very
heavy. So anything you can save on anti-spam
On 4/27/21 10:24 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Agreed on the OT and good subject change.
:-)
For me, I wouldn't bind DNS to the eth0, just another attack surface
hence I would use local loopback.
I think the main reason to bind to eth0 / LAN is for when there are
multiple (mail) servers
3 matches
Mail list logo
