Hi,
thank you all for the replies. "Don't do it" was also my first thought.
Andrea
Il 24/02/2017 21:19, /dev/rob0 ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously
>> a bad idea in the first place.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously
> a bad idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later
> expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid
> weasels a
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 2/24/17, 03:42, "bind-users on behalf of Andrea Gabellini" wrote:
>
>>the server is a resolver for about 20K clients. My goal is to supply a
>>courtesy page if a domain is not found. For every domain.
>
> No approach relying on wildcards wi
On 2/24/17, 03:42, "bind-users on behalf of Andrea Gabellini" wrote:
>the server is a resolver for about 20K clients. My goal is to supply a
>courtesy page if a domain is not found. For every domain.
No approach relying on wildcards will work because of the way wildcards "work."
(*.example.com
4 matches
Mail list logo