Hello
This days i got a strange behavior in my network/bind server.
Each 20/30 minutes and lasting about 5 minutes i got 'timeout' in bind
querys. After that time everything works fine again.
My bind server got response (from 0.1 to 2 seconds) but reply with a ICMP
'port unreachable'.
Any idea
Hi all,
I had a bind 9.16.4 as recursive name server. I want to forward all queries
to a specific dns server out of my net such as 8.8.8.8. While I have a new
domain( such as abc.com) I want to forward to a new dns server such as
9.9.9.9.
Here is my named.conf:
options {
listen-on port
Dear I've implemented two views, one for local resolution and the other for
forward a public zone to our resolver.
But now I have a problem:
If I define the same clients for the local zone view and forward view,
depending on the order of the views the client can resolve or not the
query. In this
Hi all,
I'm runnig some analisys on my BIND instances, I'm interested in find out
how much time it takes every single query, but I' can't find and option to
show this information in the log
The dns is used by our customers and they ask for detailed reports (
they'll never read ... :)
It would be a
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hello,
I've got a raspberry pi with 5 network interfaces (3 WLAN and
two wired LAN).
Also, I have set up a BIND 9 server. Now I want to give the PI (the
hostname is DEV) a different IP address for every single interface.
For example: when a client from the network 192.168.2.0/24
From: Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org,
Date: 05/02/2013 15:26
Subject: Re: Selective resolution in a corporate environment
On 05/02/13 15:16, funky monkey wrote:
But to get back to what I'm often asked for, more as a tactical
solution, is there any way
In message 20121130125333.gc9...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
On 29.11.12 18:34, Jose Manuel Delgado G. wrote:
about the other question, as to reduce the response time of my server when
the domain does not exist?
it is not the domain does not exist problem. This is the the
I'd like to install on Ubuntu 12.04 a DNS server using BIND9.
As a first step, I'd just like to configure it as a forwarder for my box
only.
This is what I do:
1. I deactivate `dnsmasq` editing
`/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf` by commenting the `dns=dnsmasq`
line.
Before, the
Dear all,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
== the zone titi.be is in the same server (A) but is not transferred to the
server
In message dub109-w94faa059d21622d23e2903ac...@phx.gbl, hugo hugoo writes:
Doug
The problem is that the parent zone and the subzone are on the same name se=
rver.
If I do a dig @name_server subzone NS or dig @name_server zone NS ... =
I receive the same NS answer.
Hugo, you
Dear all,
I have a problem in the understanding of the creation of a subzone.
Here the situation; let's call the name server ns1.xxx.be
I have zone toto.be with some records (not important)
In the same name server, I want to create the subzone titi.toto.be with some
records.
== do I
Dear all,
I have a problem in the understanding of the creation of a subzone.
Here the situation; let's call the name server ns1.xxx.be
I have zone toto.be with some records (not important)
In the same name server, I want to create the subzone titi.toto.be with some
records.
== do I
On Mar 13, 2012, at 6:23 AM, hugo hugoo wrote:
I have zone toto.be with some records (not important)
In the same name server, I want to create the subzone titi.toto.be with
some records.
== do I have to create in zone toto.be the following NS record:
21.12.2011 20:40, Chris Buxton пишет:
No, that's not correct. You can use TSIG keys to differentiate between views,
without using separate interfaces.
I will try to
However, this will not solve the problem -- removing
match-recursive-only will solve the problem.
I need match-recursive-only
Hello, list!
I have split view on my name-servers (master and slave), for internal
and external clients i have zone with similar names, but different content.
Part of config named.conf on master:
view internal {
match-clients { myclients; };
recursion yes;
match-recursive-only yes;
21.12.2011 13:54, Konstantin V. Krotov пишет:
Hello, list!
I have split view on my name-servers (master and slave), for internal
and external clients i have zone with similar names, but different content.
Part of config named.conf on master:
view internal {
match-clients { myclients; };
Hi,
Maybe this can help you.
First you need two network interfaces with diferent ip.
At the internal view declaration add transfer-source 192.168.11.x; ( has to
be different from your public/external)
In the zone statement, you must specify the private IP address of your
slaves, at
No, that's not correct. You can use TSIG keys to differentiate between views,
without using separate interfaces. However, this will not solve the problem --
removing match-recursive-only will solve the problem.
Regards,
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Gelo wrote:
Hello All,
We have our slave servers running compiled Bind 9.6.1-P3 on CentOS 5.4.
Can I upgrade to 9.8.1-P1 directly from the current version 9.6.1-P3? Or It
has to be on the same 9.6.ESV-R5-P1 latest version?
Master is in internal running on Bind 9.2.1, doing only pusing the
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:01:22PM +0530,
rams brames...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
I have a record in BIND as follows:
mxdomain.com. 86400 IN MX 65536 gmail.com.
I don't think you tell us the truth. Because BIND refuses to load it:
% named-checkzone example
https://www.isc.org/files/arm96.html#types_of_resource_records_and_when_to_use_them
Scroll down to the data type MX and it says:
Identifies a mail exchange for the domain with a 16-bit preference value
(lower is better) followed by the host name of the mail exchange.
Described in RFC 974,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:02:49AM -0500,
Jeremy C. Reed jr...@isc.org wrote
a message of 8 lines which said:
Because subject was replaced I didn't find it before my response :)
You should really used a threaded mail client software (which
understands the In-Reply-To: header
Hello,
I'm seeing an unfamiliar error while attempting to start a newly built from
source named instance. I've search on the net and within the bind-user list
without luck, DST returns lots of hits, but nothing with named DST.
hoping someone here might know what its about. Is it
Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk writes:
Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)
to be fair, multiple PTR RRs is something we added in BIND
-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Master server offline
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere
-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Master server offline
References: 4be37cef.7010...@zuka.net 1273200836.7996.11.ca...@tardis
In-Reply
-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Master server offline
References: mailman.1415.1273200624.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org
barmar
28 matches
Mail list logo
