Re: 9.14.0 filter-aaaa

2019-04-15 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 05:35:42PM -0700, Carl Byington via bind-users wrote: > named-checkconf likes that, but named gets a segfault in filter-.so. > Anyone using filter-.so in a working configuation? The log shows: > > Apr 14 17:15:18 ns named[29299]: mem.c:1795: INSIST(mpctx->allocated

Re: 9.14.0 filter-aaaa

2019-04-15 Thread Victoria Risk
Sorry Carl, I see you ARE trying to use the new syntax. I saw filter- and kind of skipped over the rest… I was so excited that finally I thought I could answer something, but, it was the *wrong* answer! Vicky > On Apr 15, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Victoria Risk wrote: > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 5

Re: 9.14.0 filter-aaaa

2019-04-15 Thread Victoria Risk
> On Apr 14, 2019, at 5:35 PM, Carl Byington via bind-users > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > view "normal" { >plugin query "filter-.so" { >filter--on-v4 yes; >filter- { "brokenv6"; }; >}; > > > named-checkconf likes tha

9.14.0 filter-aaaa

2019-04-14 Thread Carl Byington via bind-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 view "normal" { plugin query "filter-.so" { filter--on-v4 yes; filter- { "brokenv6"; }; }; named-checkconf likes that, but named gets a segfault in filter-.so. Anyone using filter-.so in a working con