- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:32 PM
To: David Li
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
I've yet to see a system that doesn'
a zone file that have these records defined. Any idea?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > --
>> >
>> > Message: 3
>> > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:25:43 -0500
>> > From: Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.
On 02/19/2016 08:04 PM, John Miller wrote:
In the case of dynamic updates, one NS record might actually be
better: there's no worrying about update forwarding between slave and
master.
It's been my painful experience that (particularly Windows) clients send
dynamic DNS updates to the MNAME
Am 20.02.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Miller:
Will a zone even load with zero NS records? It's not something I've
ever tried, though probably should for grins
no, bind won't start at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> John Miller wrote:
>
>> And if you actually want people to use your zone or you want NOTIFY
>> working, two NS records (and
In article ,
John Miller wrote:
> And if you actually want people to use your zone or you want NOTIFY
> working, two NS records (and possibly glue) are really a must.
He mentioned that these are internal nameservers,
In article ,
David Li wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Well, I was wrong about the log. I did find some info about why zone
> transfer failed. On one server running zone rack1.com, I see:
>
> Feb 19 16:04:27 dli-centos7
users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of David Li
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 7:09 PM
To: John W. Blue
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
Hi John,
Well, I was wrong about the log. I did find some info about why zone transfer
failed. On one server running zone rack1.com, I see:
Fe
Regardless of how NOTIFY's behaving (it's a nice-to-have, not a must),
you need to make sure zone transfers from master to slave are working.
If you can run
dig @10.4.1.101 rack1.com AXFR
from your slave, then zone transfers of rack1.com are working from
master to slave, and your issue lies
As pointed out previously, however, with a 1-minute REFRESH, NOTIFY is pretty
much a non-issue.
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Kevin (FCA)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 4:25 PM
To: BIND Users
Subject: RE: A Zone Transfer Question
How
the master...
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of David Li
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:56 PM
To: John Miller
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: A Zon
Hi David,
Something I'm not seeing in your config is an options {} block that
lays out your defaults for allow-transfer, allow-notify, also-notify,
etc. Those are important things to know when it comes to
troubleshooting zone transfer issues. Unless you've got a specific
reason for not doing
.
- Kevin
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John W. Blue
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:19 PM
To: David Li
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
"kick off" as in update the zone and not by using dig.
John
"kick off" as in update the zone and not by using dig.
John
Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/>
From: "John W. Blue" <john.b...@rrcic.com>
Sent: Feb 19, 2016 1:17 PM
To: David Li
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
Nothing in the log
David,
>
> You can get started by checking your log files to see if named is
> complaining about anything it might not like that is preventing the
> transfer.
>
> John
>
> Sent from Nine
>
> From: David Li <dlipub...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Feb 19, 2016 10:
Hi John,
Here are the files. They are all internal zones without any references
to external name servers.
VM1:
named.conf:
-
#
# master (on VM1)
#
zone "rack1.com" {
type master;
file "/var/named/db.rack1.com";
allow-update { key rndc-key-rack1; }; # For DHCP
sers
Subject: A Zone Transfer Question
This is my first time to try master slave configuration. Here is a
brief description:
I have two Centos 7.1 VMs - each is configured for a zone. VM1 is the
master for zone1 and slave for zone2. VM2 is master for zone2 and
slave for zone1. Both zo
Dear, I've implemented two Debian 7 servers with Bind9 as a Master - Slave
schema.
Everything works OK, but I have just a question:
When a create a new zone in the Master and reload the bind9 daemon, this
zone doesn't appear automatically in the Slaveit only appears if I
restart the bind9
In article mailman.2651.1397662255.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jeronimo L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, I've implemented two Debian 7 servers with Bind9 as a Master - Slave
schema.
Everything works OK, but I have just a question:
When a create a new zone in the Master and
On 4/16/2014 11:35 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.2651.1397662255.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jeronimo L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, I've implemented two Debian 7 servers with Bind9 as a Master - Slave
schema.
Everything works OK, but I have just a question:
Dear Jim, where do I have to execute the command rndc reconfig, in master
or slave ??
Thanks a lot to both.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jim Glassford jmgl...@iup.edu wrote:
On 4/16/2014 11:35 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.2651.1397662255.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org
On 4/16/14, 11:42 AM, Jim Glassford wrote:
To quicken the update process can use also-notify in options
also-notify {
slave1.n.n.n;
slave2.n.n.n;
};
There is no reason to use also-notify in this situation.
Please don't do this unless you know what you are
Dear Alan, sorry but I don't understand...can yo help me on this please:
When create a new zone in Master and add the zone parameters in
named.conf.local, before the Slave get the new zone do I have to write by
hand the same zone parameters in Slave's named.conf.local and restart its
bind9
On 4/16/14, 1:27 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral wrote:
Dear Alan, sorry but I don't understand...can yo help me on this please:
When create a new zone in Master and add the zone parameters in
named.conf.local, before the Slave get the new zone do I have to write
by hand the same zone parameters in
In article mailman.2653.1397662961.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jim Glassford jmgl...@iup.edu wrote:
On 4/16/2014 11:35 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.2651.1397662255.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jeronimo L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, I've implemented
In article mailman.2654.1397663394.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jeronimo L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Jim, where do I have to execute the command rndc reconfig, in master
or slave ??
Thanks a lot to both.
Jim didn't post the rndc reconfig info, I did. You execute it on
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jeronimo L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear, I've implemented two Debian 7 servers with Bind9 as a Master - Slave
schema.
Everything works OK, but I have just a question:
When a create a new zone in the Master and reload the bind9 daemon, this
zone
27 matches
Mail list logo