I like bind-next too - shame we didn’t think of it when we created the
repositories.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
> On 1. 12. 2021, at 17:56, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> Well, why not, I like that. Only slight disadvantage to bind9-dev is it
> is never called similar way by ISC in
Well, why not, I like that. Only slight disadvantage to bind9-dev is it
is never called similar way by ISC in any document. It is short,
understandable, without conflicts. Describes well purpose and difference
of that release also.
Thank you for this suggestion, an excellent candidate!
On
If you don't like nginx naming, then what about Linux kernel naming:
bind-next (similarly linux-next)?
Petr Špaček
On 01. 12. 21 13:07, pemensik at redhat.com (Petr Menšík) wrote:
Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC
to identify that major version. When I
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: A good name for development branch releases package
On 12/1/21 14:00, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are
> development snapshots anyway...
That would look like our custom tarballs made
.org
Subject: Re: A good name for development branch releases package
On 12/1/21 14:00, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are
> development snapshots anyway...
That would look like our custom tarballs made from main branch commits.
I
On 12/1/21 14:00, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are
> development snapshots anyway...
That would look like our custom tarballs made from main branch commits.
I don't want to do arbitrary releases directly from git. Release notes
What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are
development snapshots anyway...
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
> On 1. 12. 2021, at 13:07, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC
> to identify
Hi there,
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021, Petr Men??k wrote:
... Would you have some idea, how should it be called?
Call a spade a spade. Or in this case "bind9-unstable".
Do you like "bind9-dev" base name?
No. It will cause confusion.
--
73,
Ged.
___
Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC
to identify that major version. When I download an archive, it uses
Development status. Is mainline word ever used in any documentation for
BIND9? I have never seen that in any article. I would like to use
something users can
I quite like the nginx naming - stable and mainline.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 30. 11. 2021, at 16:10, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> Hello BIND users,
Hi Petr,
Le 11/30/21 16:09, Petr Menšík a écrit :
Is there any distribution offering already two releases at the same
time? Would you have some idea, how should it be called? Do you like
"bind9-dev" base name?
For example, FreeBSD provides 3 bind releases :
- dns/bind-devel
- dns/bind911
-
Hello BIND users,
I would like to add a new package of recent BIND9 development release to
Fedora [1] distribution. Current "bind" package contains build of stable
branch 9.16.x release. I think it would be good to keep stable releases
available in Fedora. We still use just bind without 9 suffix.
12 matches
Mail list logo
