In article ,
"Nuno Paquete" wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Usually we use forwarders so we don't always have to bother root
> servers.
You only bother the root servers when the TLD's NS records aren't in
cache. Since these NS records have 2-day TTLs, you don't have to go to
the root servers very often
Greg,
Usually we use forwarders so we don't always have to bother root
servers.
Because our ISP's deals with great amount of requests from all the
clients, probably most of your new requests are already in their cache
and it's much faster than query a root server, because it's on the same
network
unopaquete=lusocargo...@lists.isc.org] Em
> nome de listserv.traf...@sloop.net
> Enviada: quinta-feira, 15 de Abril de 2010 01:34
> Para: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Assunto: Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
> My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am
unopaquete=lusocargo...@lists.isc.org] Em
nome de listserv.traf...@sloop.net
Enviada: quinta-feira, 15 de Abril de 2010 01:34
Para: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Assunto: Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common
question.
loop.net"
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wed, April 14, 2010 8:33:55 PM
Subject: Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common
question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful
in knowing what to l
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common
question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful
in knowing what to look at, or what to modify.
---
CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6
i386
Hardware:
P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory
Sata drives - non mirrored etc.
Load is li
6 matches
Mail list logo
