Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

I know this is an incredibly old thread, but I was wondering if there has been any progress on this topic within the last 8 years. I am attempting to use views to offer different configurations of RPZ filtering to different subsets of the user population. My original approach was having

Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

Hi Kenneth I'm also struggling with the in-view clause and RPZ zones at this moment, documentation says that the in-view clause can't be used in policy zones, and I really don't know why is that programmed that way, it shouldn't matter if it t's a regular zone or a rpz zone. I'm using the 9.10.3

Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

RPZ zones are hooked deeper into the view than just a single attachment point. There is lots of auxillary data that needs to be built and maintained at the view level with back references. Sharing this is hard and has not been done. Now if someone want's to spend the time to code the necessary

BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

Why doesn't BIND accept the in-view option for RPZ zone definitions? named-checkconf has no problem with it, but BIND chokes on startup. I'm running BIND 9.10.2-P4 from Gentoo Linux's net-dns/bind-9.10.2_p4 package. Has this been fixed in a later version? Am I doing something really silly?

Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

On 11/05/2015 05:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > If you remove the "allow-update { any; };" named doesn't treat the > file as writeable. It's not file permissions. It's whether named > will potentially update the file itself or not. Oh! Thanks for the clarification! signature.asc Description:

Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

In message <563c015c.1020...@gmail.com>, Kenneth Lakin writes: > > On 11/05/2015 04:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > RPZ zones are hooked deeper into the view than just a single > > attachment point. There is lots of auxillary data that needs to > > be built and maintained at the view level with

Re: BIND-9.10.2-P4: Cannot use in-view to refer to RPZ zone definitions: "'$RPZ_ZONE' is not a master or slave zone"

On 11/05/2015 04:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > RPZ zones are hooked deeper into the view than just a single > attachment point. There is lots of auxillary data that needs to > be built and maintained at the view level with back references. > Sharing this is hard and has not been done. So, I