Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-06-10 Thread Greg Rivers
On Friday, 17 April 2020 08:45:16 CDT Steinar Haug wrote: > We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. > > Environment: > FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE. > BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages. > Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages. > Authoritative only. > Around 800

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-20 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 2020-04-17 06:45, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. > > Environment: > FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE. > BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages. > Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages. > Authoritative only. > Around 800 zones of var

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-19 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:55:53PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > I now have a pcap file of queries that I can replay with the "drool" > application, and I'm consistently seeing similar memory leak problems > (i.e. the problems are reproducible). The memory leak rate seems to be > very approxima

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-19 Thread sthaug
Followup: > We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. > > Environment: > FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE. > BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages. > Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages. > Authoritative only. > Around 800 zones of varying sizes. DNSSEC in use. > > Run

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-17 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 17/04/2020 17:02, Karl Pielorz wrote: Hi Karl, > I seem to remember we got 'bitten' by large memory use when moving from > a previous version of bind - do you have 'max-cache-size' set in your > config? It's an authoritative-only server, so there is (almost) no caching involved. Anand __

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-17 Thread sthaug
>> We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. ... > I seem to remember we got 'bitten' by large memory use when moving > from a previous version of bind - do you have 'max-cache-size' set in > your config? Yes. Set to 1G. In reality it shouldn't need a cache at all, since

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-17 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 17 April 2020 at 15:45:16 +0200 sth...@nethelp.no wrote: We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. ... Running a ps command for the named process every minute and logging the result, I see the named virtual memory size (VSZ) increasing at around 1.2 Mbyte/min

BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-17 Thread sthaug
We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. Environment: FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE. BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages. Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages. Authoritative only. Around 800 zones of varying sizes. DNSSEC in use. Running a ps command for the named