Re: Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

2013-06-10 Thread mikep
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Dennis Clarke wrote: That seems oddthough I haven't tried building 9.9.3-P1 yet. But, all the previous releases built with gcc. Our Solaris package build/management system only has gcc. BIND 9.9.3 was the first BIND that got built 64-bit, which did take a little extra

Re: Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

2013-06-09 Thread Dennis Clarke
That seems oddthough I haven't tried building 9.9.3-P1 yet. But, all the previous releases built with gcc. Our Solaris package build/management system only has gcc. BIND 9.9.3 was the first BIND that got built 64-bit, which did take a little extra work in getting it find our

Re: Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

2013-06-07 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
That seems oddthough I haven't tried building 9.9.3-P1 yet. But, all the previous releases built with gcc. Our Solaris package build/management system only has gcc. BIND 9.9.3 was the first BIND that got built 64-bit, which did take a little extra work in getting it find our 64-bit builds

Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

2013-06-06 Thread Mike Peterson
Is there any way to build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'? There are many other packages that use OpenSSL that only build with 'gcc', but BIND 9.9.3-P1 won't compile on Solaris 10 with 'gcc' (I think it did previously, as my notes have 'CC=gcc' set in the

Re: Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

2013-06-06 Thread Mark Andrews
Supported in this case means accept bug reports for not we know it won't work. Mark In message 51b0ba26.9030...@noc.utoronto.ca, Mike Peterson writes: Is there any way to build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'? There are many other packages that use