Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they work
for A records
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
Technically, yes. It is a very bad idea, but it works.
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they
work for A
http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4592
This link should help you.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 10
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +0530,
ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote
a message of 20 lines which said:
If wildcard DNS is a bad idea,
Wildcards *address* records (A and ), not all wildcards.
See http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ssac-report-09jul04.pdf
or
Hey! RTFRFC! :-)
Except a scanning of that RFC doesn't say anything about not using them,
only in clarifying RFC 1034's intentions regarding wildcards.
So, why is it a very bad idea?
Peter
Mike Ragusa wrote:
http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4592
This link should help you.
On
In message 4ae5c6cc.8020...@ou.edu, Peter Laws writes:
Hey! RTFRFC! :-)
Except a scanning of that RFC doesn't say anything about not using them,
only in clarifying RFC 1034's intentions regarding wildcards.
So, why is it a very bad idea?
Peter
What is legal and what works well are
6 matches
Mail list logo
