In article ,
Ron wrote:
> Barry,
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > In article ,
> > John Wobus wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> >> > In article ,
> >> > Mark Andrews wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> How do you actually expect this to ev
Barry,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> John Wobus wrote:
>
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> > In article ,
>> > Mark Andrews wrote:
>> >
>> >> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
>> >
>> > I'm pretty sure G
In article ,
John Wobus wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> >> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure Google DNS does this. Other resolver operators often get
> > complaints ab
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:49 PM John Wobus wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > In article ,
> > Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> >> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure Google DNS does this. Other resolver operators often get
>
On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
>
> I'm pretty sure Google DNS does this. Other resolver operators often get
> complaints about "Why can't I look up through your DNS
> serv
On 2016-03-19 19:03, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
Dave Warren wrote:
My current logic is that I do a SOA query and check the serial number,
if it has changed, I query every needed hostname into a temp file, and
if every single query was successful, check the SOA again, and if it
still
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 4:46 AM
To: G.W. Haywood
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when the
upstream DNS server is unresponsive
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Ha
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> That's feasible if you can reconfigure all the client machines to do
> this. It's not very scalable if you have a network of machines running
> different operating systems, and you'd like to have your central
> resolver take care of all th
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
I'm pretty sure Google DNS does this. Other resolver operators often get
complaints about "Why can't I look up through your DNS
servers when I can do it through Google DNS?"
> Caches will generally
rom:* bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:
> bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] *On Behalf Of *Ron
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:37 AM
> *To:* bind-users@lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when
> the upstream DNS server
In article ,
Dave Warren wrote:
> My current logic is that I do a SOA query and check the serial number,
> if it has changed, I query every needed hostname into a temp file, and
> if every single query was successful, check the SOA again, and if it
> still matches, update the /etc/hosts. If a
, and this
> > uncertainty raises security and/or liability concerns.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - Kevin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Ron [mailto:ron.a...@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 11:46 AM
> > *To:* Darcy Kevin (FCA
On 2016-03-18 00:12, G.W. Haywood wrote:
I'd just put something in /etc/hosts and send myself an email every
month or so to remind me I'd done that.
I once wrote a script that periodically did zonetransfer, parsed output
and updated the /etc/hosts file.
/Anders
__
On 3/17/16, 10:15 AM, "Ron" wrote:
> According to the BIND9 docs:
>
> cleaning-interval This interval is effectively obsolete. Previously, the
>server would remove
> expired resource records from the cache every cleaning-interval minutes.
>BIND 9 now
> manages cache memory in a more sophisticat
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> How about a list of domains for which cached RRs will not be purged
> _unless_ a different RR is supplied by the 'upstream' server?
>
Or, with Barry Margolin's comments in mind, a dynamic list, which is
compiled from the domains that are accessed, s
Hi there,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
... in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his DNS servers
working, and we just want to keep the connectivity.
I'd just put something in /etc/hosts and send myself an email every
month or so to remind me I'd done that.
--
73,
Ged.
___
On 3/17/2016 12:36:31 +0100 Ron wrote:
Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when
the upstream DNS server is unresponsive?
Hi,
subject says all. Read manpages, could not find this in the FAQ's.
Hope this is possible. If not does anyone know of other name servers
rcy
> NAFTA Information Security Projects
>
>
>
> FCA US LLC
>
> 1075 W Entrance Dr,
>
> Auburn Hills, MI 48326
>
> USA
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1 (248) 838-6601
> Mobile: +1 (810) 397-0103
>
> Email: kevin.da...@fcagroup.com
>
>
>
> *From:
Hi,
subject says all. Read manpages, could not find this in the FAQ's.
Hope this is possible. If not does anyone know of other name servers
that offer this option?
Thanks,
Ron Arts
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to un
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> On 3/17/2016 12:36:31 +0100 Ron wrote:
>
> Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when
>>> the upstream DNS server is unresponsive?
>>>
>>
> Hi,
>>
>> subject says
Dave,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2016-03-18 01:46, Ron wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Haywood
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
>>
>>> ... in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his DNS servers
>>> worki
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Haywood
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
>
> ... in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his DNS servers
>> working, and we just want to keep the connectivity.
>>
>
> I'd just put something in /etc/hosts and send myself an e
MI 48326
>
> USA
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1 (248) 838-6601
> Mobile: +1 (810) 397-0103
>
> Email: kevin.da...@fcagroup.com
>
>
>
> *From:* bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:
> bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] *On Behalf Of *Ron
> *Sent:* Friday, March 18, 20
On 2016-03-18 01:46, Ron wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Haywood
mailto:b...@jubileegroup.co.uk>> wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
... in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his
DNS servers
working, and we just want
, 2016 7:37 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when the
upstream DNS server is unresponsive
Hi,
subject says all. Read manpages, could not find this in the FAQ's.
Hope this is possible. If not does anyone know of other name se
Subject: Re: Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when the
upstream DNS server is unresponsive
I did not mean forwarders, but I had a case where the authoritative name
servers for a domain were down
for an extended period of time, exceeding the ttl for their records.
18, 2016 4:41 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when the
upstream DNS server is unresponsive
Slave the zone? Oh, run secondary. Fat chance.
Ron
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA)
mailto:kevin.da...@fcagrou
27 matches
Mail list logo
