Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Simon Dodd
I'm having a problem configuring a delegation. We have various /24s for which we provide PTR records. If I create a zone file for 188.134.63.in-addr.arpa and add PTR records, they resolve just fine. In other words, if this is my zone, I can resolve 63.134.188.13: $TTL 6h @ 345600 IN SOA

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Simon Dodd wrote: I'm having a problem configuring a delegation. We have various /24s for which we provide PTR records. If I create a zone file for 188.134.63.in-addr.arpa and add PTR records, they resolve just fine. In other words, if this is my zone,

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.1304.1260905564.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Chris Buxton cbux...@menandmice.com wrote: It's not a valid delegation unless you control the parent zone. ARIN is delegating the /24 reverse zone to you. You therefore have four options that give control of the PTR records

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:42:37PM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: ... A fifth option is to use RFC 2317-style classless delegation for all 256 entries in the reverse domain: $GENERATE 0-255 $ IN CNAME $.0/24 0/24 IN NS ns1.midwestfirst.com. 0/24 IN NS ns2.midwestfirst.com.

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Chris Thompson
On Dec 15 2009, Simon Dodd wrote: I'm having a problem configuring a delegation. We have various /24s for which we provide PTR records. If I create a zone file for 188.134.63.in-addr.arpa and add PTR records, they resolve just fine. In other words, if this is my zone, I can resolve

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Simon Dodd
Thanks for the replies, everyone; I think the consensus is that having ARIN redelegate is the correct solution, and that's fine by me. (As mentioned, my marching orders were to do this without redelegating, but if that's the correct way to do it, I can make that case.) -Simon On Tue, Dec 15,

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Doug Barton
Simon Dodd wrote: Thanks for the replies, everyone; I think the consensus is that having ARIN redelegate is the correct solution, and that's fine by me. (As mentioned, my marching orders were to do this without redelegating, but if that's the correct way to do it, I can make that case.) It IS

Re: Delegating in reverse lookup zones

2009-12-15 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.1304.1260905564.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Chris Buxton cbux...@menandmice.com wrote: It's not a valid delegation unless you control the parent zone. ARIN is delegating the /24 reverse zone to you. You therefore