Re: Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available

2017-10-08 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" wrote: > It should be noted that answering from cache, e.g. when a server gets an RD=0 > query, or if it doesn't happen to honor recursion for that particular client, > was

RE: Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available

2017-10-06 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
nd-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Margolin Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 12:47 PM To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org Subject: Re: Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available In article <mailman.714.1507277541.702.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Harshit

Re: Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available

2017-10-06 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Harshith Mulky wrote: > What I am not able to understand is, What would happen when resolver does not > set Recursion Desired bit in the query it sends? If RD is not set, the server should simply not

Re: Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available

2017-10-06 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:11:56AM +, Harshith Mulky wrote: > What I am not able to understand is, What would happen when resolver > does not set Recursion Desired bit in the query it sends? > > If Recursion is supported on the server, Would the server do the > Referral Queries and set the RA

Differences Between Recursion Desired and Recursion Available

2017-10-06 Thread Harshith Mulky
Hello Experts, I read this from RFC1035 about RD and RA Bits RD Recursion Desired - this bit may be set in a query and is copied into the response if recursion supported by this Name Server. If Recursion is rejected by this Name Server, for example it has been configured as Authoritative