Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and let me know if it mitigates the problem?
On 29.01.09 22:50, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow.
Named with JINMEI Tatuy patch:
max-cache-size 800M;
Morning Statistic
version: 9.6.0-P1
CPUs found: 8
worker threads: 8
number of zones: 1040
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:23:19 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
Named with JINMEI Tatuy patch:
max-cache-size 800M;
It's way too much, if this applies to all of the 50 views.
With you patch? Total memory on server 12Gb.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 04.02.09 11:23, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
It's impossible, :-( over 500'000 client use bind and we must use views
to split load on another services.
Named with JINMEI Tatuy patch:
max-cache-size 800M;
It's way too much, if this applies to all of the 50
At Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:51:10 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
max-cache-size 800M;
It's way too much, if this applies to all of the 50 views.
Oh! I decrease memory to 16Mb.
Okay, and according to this:
: Started at Feb 3 00:51 (Now Feb 4 11:15:37) MSK
: Startup mem:
В Пнд, 26/01/2009 в 16:16 -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 пишет:
http://www.jinmei.org/patch/bind9-lrucache.diff
(should be cleanly applicable to 9.6).
and let me know if it mitigates the problem?
Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow.
Other recommendations:
- I previously suggested using a
В Пнд, 26/01/2009 в 16:16 -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 пишет:
http://www.jinmei.org/patch/bind9-lrucache.diff
(should be cleanly applicable to 9.6).
and let me know if it mitigates the problem?
On 29.01.09 22:50, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow.
Other
At Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:12:11 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
+50 views of zone data + memory for 10 clients +
You have a 32bit build which will give a maximum of 2G data.
You are just trying to cram too much into too small a place.
OK. May be you
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This is _NOT_ a problem of BIND. This is a problem of its admin who can't
read the docs and set up max-cache-size, which does exactly what is needed
in this case.
On 21.01.09 17:38, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Hmm... And why bind allocate all system memory, if
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:10:05PM +0300, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
view view0{
max-cache-size 16M;
match-clients {
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX;
};
include net-views/view0.conf;
};
[... skip 48 views ...]
view view50{
max-cache-size 8M;
match-clients {
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX;
};
Actually thinking about your problem i just got an idea for a quick and
dirty solution that might just be it for you:
Keep running the views on your fontend nameserver but forward all
recursive queries to another recursive server via the forward only;
statement. IIRC that should cause BIND not to
On 20.01.09 12:49, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
if you know that setting TTL to 0 is a bad idea, why do yuo think that
disabling a cache in BIND is not a bad idea?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Because under high load
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This is _NOT_ a problem of BIND. This is a problem of its admin who can't
read the docs and set up max-cache-size, which does exactly what is needed
in this case.
Hmm... And why bind allocate all system memory, if max-cache-size 16M?
And views... 50 views.
In message 49773369.4080...@corbina.net, Dmitry Rybin writes:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This is _NOT_ a problem of BIND. This is a problem of its admin who can't
read the docs and set up max-cache-size, which does exactly what is needed
in this case.
Hmm... And why bind
Hello!
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.01.09 12:49, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
if you know that setting TTL to 0 is a bad idea, why do yuo think that
disabling a cache in BIND is not a bad idea?
Because under high load cache grows to maximum
On 20.01.09 12:49, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
if you know that setting TTL to 0 is a bad idea, why do yuo think that
disabling a cache in BIND is not a bad idea?
On 20.01.09 18:39, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Because
caching in the
nameserver.
On Jan 20, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Hello!
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
17 matches
Mail list logo
