-8258
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Borgia, Joe A CTR
USAF AFMC AFRL/RIOS
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:59 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Dynamic DNS and Slave Servers
I'm trying to learn DDNS
On Jun 19 2009, Borgia, Joe A CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RIOS wrote:
Should running a rndc freeze and thaw on the slave server also push the data
from the .jnl files directly to the tables as they do on the master server?
For some weird reason, running a rndc freeze and thaw on the slave runs
List
Subject: RE: Dynamic DNS and Slave Servers
On Jun 19 2009, Borgia, Joe A CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RIOS wrote:
Should running a rndc freeze and thaw on the slave server also push the
data
from the .jnl files directly to the tables as they do on the master server?
For some weird reason, running a rndc
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:49AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
Yes. Once a zone is dynamic, you're no longer allowed to edit the zone
file directly (unless you make it static again, for example by use of
...
For which reason, of course, dynamic data should always be in a separate
/Rome Research Site/RIOS
COMM: 315-330-3952
DSN: 587-3952
FAX: 315-330-8258
-Original Message-
From: Joseph S D Yao [mailto:j...@tux.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:10 PM
To: Chris Buxton
Cc: Borgia, Joe A CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RIOS; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic DNS
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:49AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
Yes. Once a zone is dynamic, you're no longer allowed to edit the zone
file directly (unless you make it static again, for example by use of
...
For which reason, of course, dynamic data should
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:41:04 -0400
From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:49AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
[...]
For which reason, of course, dynamic data should always be in a
separate subdomain from static data, which may someday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Jun-2009, at 14:25, Gregory Hicks wrote:
Kevin:
I'll bite! What is the difference between a sub*domain* and a
sub*zone*?
I don't see how you could have the one w/o the other. But that could
be because I'm feeling especially slow today.
All subzones are subdomains.
But a subdomain isn't a subzone unless it's delegated from the parent zone.
Also, subzones have zone definitions in named.conf. Undelegated
subdomains do not.
- Kevin
Gregory Hicks wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:41:04 -0400
From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
Kevin Darcy wrote:
All subzones are subdomains.
But a subdomain isn't a subzone unless it's delegated from the parent
zone.
Actually, it is possible to have an undelegated (sub)zone, but not
considered a good practice, because then you have to explicitly define
that zone on all nameservers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:44:18PM -0400, Borgia, Joe A CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RIOS
wrote:
Although, I should be able to add static data to a dynamic data zone either
with nsupdate or with freezing and thawing the zone, correct?
If you're using nsupdate, is it static data? ;-)
But, yes. Static
On Jun 18, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:49AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
...
Yes. Once a zone is dynamic, you're no longer allowed to edit the
zone
file directly (unless you make it static again, for example by use of
...
For which reason, of course,
There really isn't such a thing as a static zone. All
zones are subject to change. You just have a choice in how
you change them. Via UPDATE or via some other mechanism.
If a zone was truely static you wouldn't need a serial
number in the SOA. You
13 matches
Mail list logo
