Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello Mark, thanx a lot for your feedback. the rule that works at the moment for only ONE client: grant WS-YBCL150939\$\@EXAMPLE.TEST subdomain example.test. ANY; Because bind support both it should also work with: grant ws-ybcl150...@example.test subdomain example.test. ANY; right? But for

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello Mark i am not that professional in bind. Normally I am a CISCO expert but now I also do the bind for 6 months. I cannot imagine why this post should help me. What do this match-type external mean? I am not aware of running any external daemon. Or was this just for the ACLs problem from

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hi Nicholas, thanx for your hint but unfortunately it gets also a refuse. cheers, 2011/5/11 Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu Try: grant EXAMPLE.TEST subdomain EXAMPLE.TEST ANY; _ Nicholas Miller, ITS, University of

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/05/11 09:33, Juergen Dietl wrote: Hello Mark i am not that professional in bind. Normally I am a CISCO expert but now I also do the bind for 6 months. I cannot imagine why this post should help me. It doesn't really. You should only need this: grant EXAMPLE.COM ms-self * any; What

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello Phil, Hello Mark, after trying a lot the last hours I came to the same result. grant EXAMPLE.COM ms-self * any; works. All the other things for example EXAMPLE.COM krb5-self * any; etc. dont work. So I will put this rule in any zone with the relating domain. The ms-self command is not

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message BANLkTi=f=LP2WTSEck940CvqzxL=dsi...@mail.gmail.com, Juergen Dietl writes: --20cf30549e9f7b6a2604a30ffc67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Mark, thanx a lot for your feedback. the rule that works at the moment for only ONE client: grant

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Juergen Dietl
2011/5/12 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org I suggest that you look at the documentation for external and use it. Hello Mark, thanx a lot for your explanation. One last question. What do you mean with your sentence above? Do you mean that?: +++

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message banlktincegux9+9n6n0y5t-cub8vjtg...@mail.gmail.com, Juergen Dietl writes: --90e6ba6134ba89740204a312cb5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Phil, Hello Mark, after trying a lot the last hours I came to the same result. grant EXAMPLE.COM ms-self * any;

GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello, i run GSS-TSIG on a SuSE Enterprise 11 Server using bind 9.8 latest version. I have 3 domains: example1.test example2.test example3.test I created 3 keys and merge them with ktutil. Now I want to use update policy: For this I have the follwoing rule: update-policy { grant * subdomain

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
Juergen, I use GSS-TSIG and the handbook says that in gss-tsig the content of the identity field ist the common secret which is the kerberos principal. I believe you'll have to set `tkey-gssapi-credential' and `tkey-domain` for this to work the way you want, though I do confess to not have a

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Andrews
To match machines in the EXAMPLE.COM realm you would use one of these. Windows uses the following sort of identity for machines machinename$@EXAMPLE.COM grant EXAMPLE.COM ms-self * any; grant EXAMPLE.COM ms-subdomain * any; Kerberos uses the following identities for

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Phil Mayers
On 11/05/11 12:17, Mark Andrews wrote: {ms,krb5}-subdomain allows updates of *.machinename One note - this isn't so handy if you have a disjoint namespace, where: machinename.*.example.com ...is what you want. We are in this boat, and can't use the built in ACLs for this very reason.

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello, and thanx for all your answeres. I want to ask the question again in a shorter way: If I look in the log the client tells the dns-server: request has valid signature: WS-YBCL150939\$\@EXAMPLE.TEST when I now put in the rule: grant WS-YBCL150939\$\@EXAMPLE.TEST subdomain example.test.

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Juergen Dietl
Hello Mark, thanx for your anwer. Your first sentence maybe help me to understand why this is the client´s credential that it needs in the rule: WS-YBCL150939\$\@EXAMPLE.COM So fist is the hostname then the slash makes the $-sign just to be a normal letter and not variable for example, and the

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
So I look for a way that I can say that all clients from EXAMPLE.TEST are allowed to update their own record (or whatever). Sounds like a task for update-policy external [1], but note that that requires updates to be sent via TCP and not UDP. [2] -JP [1]:

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message BANLkTim7k4KYxYoz=awj9mwtczvxb32...@mail.gmail.com, Juergen Dietl writes: Hello Mark, thanx for your anwer. Your first sentence maybe help me to understand why this is the client=B4s credential that it needs in the rule: WS-YBCL150939\$\@EXAMPLE.COM So fist is the

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Nicholas F Miller
Try: grant EXAMPLE.TEST subdomain EXAMPLE.TEST ANY; _ Nicholas Miller, ITS, University of Colorado at Boulder On May 11, 2011, at 7:08 AM, Juergen Dietl wrote: Hello, and thanx for all your answeres. I want to ask the question

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Phil Mayers
On 11/05/11 14:55, Mark Andrews wrote: In message4dca7893.5060...@imperial.ac.uk, Phil Mayers writes: On 11/05/11 12:17, Mark Andrews wrote: {ms,krb5}-subdomain allows updates of *.machinename One note - this isn't so handy if you have a disjoint namespace, where:

Re: GSS-TSIG update policy identity field

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 4dca7893.5060...@imperial.ac.uk, Phil Mayers writes: On 11/05/11 12:17, Mark Andrews wrote: {ms,krb5}-subdomain allows updates of *.machinename One note - this isn't so handy if you have a disjoint namespace, where: machinename.*.example.com ...is what you want. We are in