Hello again,
On Sun, 16 May 2021, I wrote:
... If you can't agree their numbers then
you're some information ...
Having screen troubles. The word 'missing' is missing.
--
73,
Ged.
___
Please visit
Hi there,
On Sun, 16 May 2021, Dan Egli wrote:
... I'm aware of the buddyns.com servers not responding. Noting I can
do about that. They CLAIM I've had over 300k requests in the last couple
of weeks and have exceeded my monthly cap. I say Bull Crap ...
I'd be inclined to believe them, but
Even jupiter.eglifamily.name. doesn’t return DNSSEC signed zone:
$ dig +norec +dnssec IN mx newideatest.site @jupiter.eglifamily.name.
; <<>> DiG 9.17.11-1+0~20210318.53+debian10~1.gbp0184f1-Debian <<>> +norec
+dnssec IN mx newideatest.site @jupiter.eglifamily.name.
;; global options: +cmd
;;
Yea, I'm aware of the buddyns.com servers not responding. Noting I can
do about that. They CLAIM I've had over 300k requests in the last couple
of weeks and have exceeded my monthly cap. I say Bull Crap and am
looking to move to different servers.
Meanwhile, I found that the google
Sorry, miss read your version 11 vs 16. That said it is hard to work out what
is going wrong when
you keep changing things and don’t actually have nameservers that are
responding. You had servers
that where giving DNSSEC responses, then ones that are returning unsigned
responses and now ones
I think Mark jumped on something else, your zone is seriously broken and not
because of DNSSEC:
https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/newideatest.site
All of these NSes must have the correct zone content and not be broken:
newideatest.site. 3600IN NS
Upgrade to WHAT? You said it was fixed in 9.11.25, but isn't that a lot
OLDER than 9.16.15, which is what I'm running?
jupiter ~ # named -v
BIND 9.16.15 (Stable Release)
jupiter ~ # dig -v
DiG 9.16.15
On 5/16/2021 12:06 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 16 May 2021, at 10:17, Dan Egli via
> On 16 May 2021, at 10:17, Dan Egli via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> On 5/10/2021 12:38 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>> Dan Egli
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Still not working for me. The dig doesn't report anything, and I don't HAVE
>>> a
>>> keyfile since i'm using inline signing. Or does inline signing still
On 5/10/2021 12:38 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
Still not working for me. The dig doesn't report anything, and I don't HAVE a
keyfile since i'm using inline signing. Or does inline signing still require a
key to be generated?
Yes, you need to do your own key management with
9 matches
Mail list logo
