Mea culpa of the Windows process. I should have indicated that as well.
Also I was remiss on not mentioning the MINIMAL-RESPONSES option in the
discussion. It sounds like there are some newer options available under
bind 9.11 and up (Thanks Mr. Andrews!)
That's why I read this list. It's a great s
On 12/18/2017 12:24 PM, Bob McDonald wrote:
I've seen cases where folks have added all of the Domain Controller
addresses for an AD forest to the NS list for a domain.
I believe that DCs do this by themselves if they are using MS-DNS. (I
think the netlogon service does a dynamic DNS update an
Bob McDonald wrote:
> I've seen cases where folks have added all of the Domain Controller
> addresses for an AD forest to the NS list for a domain. This results in
> huge TCP response packets for ALL requests to that domain.
You can safely reduce the size of answers using the `minimal-responses
Barry has a good point. I've seen cases where folks have added all of the
Domain Controller addresses for an AD forest to the NS list for a domain.
This results in huge TCP response packets for ALL requests to that domain.
Folks don't seem to get the concept of stealth slaves and the associated
NOT
In article ,
"Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:06:58 +0530, vijay bommareddy
> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations of adding
> > more slaves.
> > Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically
>
That is a valid consideration but being a slave doesn't always mean being
in the NS records.
On Dec 18, 2017 9:47 AM, "Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:06:58 +0530, vijay bommareddy
> wrote:
>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:06:58 +0530, vijay bommareddy
wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations of adding
more slaves.
Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically
support? Is there a maximum limit per master server?
Thank you
V
Barry Margolin wrote:
> vijay bommareddy wrote:
> >
> > Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically
> > support? Is there a maximum limit per master server?
>
> Why would there be any limit? The master doesn't need to keep track of
> slaves, it just responds to queries fr
In article ,
vijay bommareddy wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations of adding
> more slaves.
> Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically
> support? Is there a maximum limit per master server?
Why would there be any
Hello folks,
I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations of adding
more slaves.
Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically
support? Is there a maximum limit per master server?
Thank you
Vijay
___
Please vis
10 matches
Mail list logo