The re-design of the DNS network architecture was one of the few
internal projects where a credible Concept of Operations document
was produced. It had detailed graphics showing the flow of network
traffic between local and regional name servers. There were detailed
discussions and
What is unfortunate about BIND picking a forwarder based on real,
up-to-date information about the thing that the end-user ultimately
cares about -- how quickly the queries get answered?
Surely this is better than hardcoding a bunch of assumptions into your
forwarding configs, assumptions
When I was transferred into our corporate IT Networks group, I
inherited a DNS architecture based on forwarding DNS queries to
regional name servers. The regional name servers had access to the
Internet and were able to provide name and address resolution for both
Intranet and Internet
Hello,
Thanks for your detailed answer.
I think I don't have enough DNS knowledge to understand every bit of it,
but I'll try to clarify.
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy:
RUOFF LARS wrote:
Hi,
i'm using BIND9 on an Ubuntu-8.10-server.
I'd like to
On 17.09.09 11:16, RUOFF LARS wrote:
The reason for this is:
I have a hot-swap redundant system where 1 out of 2 servers is active at
any given time and the other is standby. DNS is (mis?-)used to tell the
clients which one is active at a given moment.
The idea is that clients resolve a name
RUOFF LARS wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your detailed answer.
I think I don't have enough DNS knowledge to understand every bit of it,
but I'll try to clarify.
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy:
RUOFF LARS wrote:
Hi,
i'm using BIND9 on an
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy
[...]
I have a hot-swap redundant system where 1 out of 2 servers
is active
at any given time and the other is standby. DNS is
(mis?-)used to tell
the clients which one is active at a given moment.
The idea is
RUOFF LARS wrote:
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy
BTW, at the moment I am experimenting a solution usign a forward zone:
zone dummy.ts IN {
type forward;
forward only;
forwarders { 172.25.32.171; 192.168.2.3; };
};
It seems
I have done some testing of the RTT forwarding and found that as long as
only one, or the other of the two nameservers that you forward to is
active at any given time the switch over is actually very quick.
The exception being the first query when the currently active forwarder dies
and the second
Hi,
i'm using BIND9 on an Ubuntu-8.10-server.
I'd like to configure the following:
For a given name (eg. vega.lab.ts), I'd like to forward the request to
two external DNS servers, *simultaneously*, and respond with the first
response that i get.
Is this possible?
I didn't see how to do it
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:20:21PM +0200, RUOFF LARS wrote:
Hi,
i'm using BIND9 on an Ubuntu-8.10-server.
I'd like to configure the following:
For a given name (eg. vega.lab.ts), I'd like to forward the request to
two external DNS servers, *simultaneously*, and respond with the first
RUOFF LARS wrote:
Hi,
i'm using BIND9 on an Ubuntu-8.10-server.
I'd like to configure the following:
For a given name (eg. vega.lab.ts), I'd like to forward the request to
two external DNS servers, *simultaneously*, and respond with the first
response that i get.
Is this possible?
Short
12 matches
Mail list logo
