Am 27.06.2014 06:11, schrieb Teerapatr Kittiratanachai:
I know that this kind of implementation isn't be recommended, but I
don't understand that why some DNS servers can answer the record as
normally while another can't.
if there is a cisco-router with NAT between anything
can happen of it
In article mailman.441.1403836337.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Teerapatr Kittiratanachai maillist...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear List,
Yesterday I try to map a private IP address on Public DNS Server, but
some server, actually 1 server, doesn't show the answer. But the Rcode
is 0.
So I
Dear List,
Yesterday I try to map a private IP address on Public DNS Server, but
some server, actually 1 server, doesn't show the answer. But the Rcode
is 0.
So I already removed that record for now. Is it possible to set DNS
server for not show answer that be the private IP address?
Regards,
On 27/06/2014 12:32, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai wrote:
Dear List,
Yesterday I try to map a private IP address on Public DNS Server, but
some server, actually 1 server, doesn't show the answer. But the Rcode
is 0.
So I already removed that record for now. Is it possible to set DNS
server for not
I know that this kind of implementation isn't be recommended, but I
don't understand that why some DNS servers can answer the record as
normally while another can't.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On 27/06/2014 12:32, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At least on BIND, this should work fine. You probably made some other
error (check wherever your logs would likely go). Apart from the fact
that, yes, no one really recommends this.
On 06/27/2014 12:11 AM, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai wrote:
I know
6 matches
Mail list logo
