Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-09-05 Thread Thomas Schulz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had grown to

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-08-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had grown to

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-07-24 Thread Thomas Schulz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had

Process size versus cache size.

2014-07-23 Thread Thomas Schulz
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had grown to 257 MB, up from an initial size of 36 MB. But when I dumped the cache

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-07-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had grown to