On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc
machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process
size increase due to the cache does not make sense.
Over about a week the process size had grown to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc
machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process
size increase due to the cache does not make sense.
Over about a week the process size had grown to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc
machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process
size increase due to the cache does not make sense.
Over about a week the process size had
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc
machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process
size increase due to the cache does not make sense.
Over about a week the process size had grown to 257 MB, up from an
initial size of 36 MB. But when I dumped the cache
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc
machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process
size increase due to the cache does not make sense.
Over about a week the process size had grown to
5 matches
Mail list logo