In message <912627.28306...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes:
> =0A=0A--- On Fri, 15/10/10, Mark Andrews wrote:=0A=0A> From=
> : Mark Andrews =0A> Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in publi=
> c DNS=0A> To: "Tech W." =0A> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org=
> =0A> Received: Friday, 15 October, 20
--- On Fri, 15/10/10, Mark Andrews wrote:
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in public DNS
> To: "Tech W."
> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
> Received: Friday, 15 October, 2010, 9:21 PM
>
> In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.c
ech W.
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in public DNS
In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W."
writes:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig
In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>
> But it does work correctly.
> for example, query the record:
>
> dig u
On 2010-10-15 10:52, Tech W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>From my perspective, blogchina.org has 12 authoritative name servers (as
reported by a0.org.afilias-nst.info).
ns1.d
5 matches
Mail list logo