On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:30:10PM +, Jack Tavares wrote:
> Recap:
> running named with "-n 1" will spin up one worker thread
> and approx 4 other threads.
Hello,
> Is there an official discussion or explanation of what these
> other threads do?
official explanation can be found in BIND sour
Recap:
running named with "-n 1" will spin up one worker thread
and approx 4 other threads.
Is there an official discussion or explanation of what these
other threads do?
--
Thanks
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Thompson [mailto:c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Chris
> Thompson
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:21 PM
> To: Jack Tavares
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Threaded bind on CentOS
>
> On Feb 24 2011,
On Feb 24 2011, Jack Tavares wrote:
I am using bind 9.7.3 and I have tried running it with
various -n values and it appears that I will always get
n+3 threads.
Ex:
I run it:
named -n 1
I get 4 threads
named -n 4
I get 7 threads
etc.
I understand the desire to have background "housekeeping"
t
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-
> users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:46 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Threa
> I am using bind 9.7.3 and I have tried running it with
> various -n values and it appears that I will always get
> n+3 threads.
I haven't tried this myself on CentOS, but.. How do you verify the amount
of threads? Checking with ps / top? What does BIND log when it starts up?
Normally it should l
6 matches
Mail list logo