I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
having a default raw format on slaves unless specified.
Interesting. I did not notice that when it happened, but now that I
look, I see that my slaves indeed have raw format files. Apparently
the switch over did not require me to do
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
having a default raw format
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
I just
: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:25 PM
To: 'Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.' lkc...@ksu.edu,
bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Thanks for that. I just remembered
On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Sorry for the double post, but I
, January 14, 2014 11:47 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from
9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by
default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have any defined
has no RFC1918, I would leave it to the default
setting?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt [mailto:bernha...@bart.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:03 PM
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Am I correct in understanding that the change
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this:
And if it is indeed enabled regardless
IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from
9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by
default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have any defined or not.
On 01/14/14 12:16, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
Is there anything I need to know regarding
Subject: Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from
9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by
default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have any defined or not.
On 01/14/14 12:16, Mike Bernhardt wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo