Re: BIND on ipv6-only server. SERVFAIL problem

2019-12-06 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 06/12/2019 13:32, Andrey Geyn wrote: Hi Andrey, > Is it any option which will allow us to proxy SERVFAIL (and other «bad» > responses) from forwarder and not to try make recursive requests by itself)? Yes. Set the option "forward only" in your BIND configuration, so that it doesn't do any

Re: BIND 9.10 IPv6 performance

2015-03-09 Thread Phil Mayers
On 08/03/15 16:09, Carsten Strotmann wrote: Hi, I'm doing some performance tests on some modern Haswell CPU machines (20 cores) using Ubuntu Linux 14.04 (Kernel 3.13.0-46-generic) using BIND 9.10.1-P2 compiled with --with-tuning=large. With using 8 worker threads I get near 400K QPS via IPv4

Re: bind and IPV6

2011-02-22 Thread Mark Andrews
In message col105-w82277b2db4a69dc3d102fac...@phx.gbl, hugo hugoo writes: Dear all, In the scope of the IPV6 deployment, I have been asked if oiyr DNS server s are IPV6 compliant. We are now upgrading all our servers to bind-9.6-ESV-R3. - Can anybody give some feedback on the IPV6

Re: bind and IPV6

2011-02-22 Thread Torinthiel
Dnia 2011-02-22 22:16 Mark Andrews napisał(a): In message col105-w82277b2db4a69dc3d102fac...@phx.gbl, hugo hugoo writes: Dear all, In the scope of the IPV6 deployment, I have been asked if oiyr DNS server s are IPV6 compliant. We are now upgrading all our servers to bind-9.6-ESV-R3. -

RE: bind and IPV6

2011-02-22 Thread Marc Lampo
Hello, I don't think BIND is the problem, here. Are the network and attached devices (routers/firewalls/switches/ISP) IPv6 ready ? That might prove to be harder. (at least : here in Belgium, our ISP's, for commercial connections are not in a hurry to offer IPv6 connectivity) Kind