On 06/12/2019 13:32, Andrey Geyn wrote:
Hi Andrey,
> Is it any option which will allow us to proxy SERVFAIL (and other «bad»
> responses) from forwarder and not to try make recursive requests by itself)?
Yes. Set the option "forward only" in your BIND configuration, so that
it doesn't do any
On 08/03/15 16:09, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some performance tests on some modern Haswell CPU machines (20
cores) using Ubuntu Linux 14.04 (Kernel 3.13.0-46-generic) using BIND
9.10.1-P2 compiled with --with-tuning=large.
With using 8 worker threads I get near 400K QPS via IPv4
In message col105-w82277b2db4a69dc3d102fac...@phx.gbl, hugo hugoo writes:
Dear all,
In the scope of the IPV6 deployment, I have been asked if oiyr DNS server
s are IPV6 compliant.
We are now upgrading all our servers to bind-9.6-ESV-R3.
- Can anybody give some feedback on the IPV6
Dnia 2011-02-22 22:16 Mark Andrews napisał(a):
In message col105-w82277b2db4a69dc3d102fac...@phx.gbl, hugo hugoo writes:
Dear all,
In the scope of the IPV6 deployment, I have been asked if oiyr DNS server
s are IPV6 compliant.
We are now upgrading all our servers to bind-9.6-ESV-R3.
-
Hello,
I don't think BIND is the problem, here.
Are the network and attached devices (routers/firewalls/switches/ISP) IPv6
ready ?
That might prove to be harder.
(at least : here in Belgium, our ISP's, for commercial connections are not
in a hurry to offer IPv6 connectivity)
Kind
5 matches
Mail list logo