Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-11 Thread Alan Clegg
On 4/11/19 9:38 AM, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 4/10/19 3:53 PM, Chandra Rao wrote: >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 AprĀ  2 13:30 /var/run -> ../run > > So, /var/run is a symlink to /var/run. > > That's probably not gonna work to well. Ok, I'm an idiot. Ignore me. (but look at the permissions, etc. on /

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-11 Thread Alan Clegg
On 4/10/19 3:53 PM, Chandra Rao wrote: > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 AprĀ  2 13:30 /var/run -> ../run So, /var/run is a symlink to /var/run. That's probably not gonna work to well. AlanC ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Chandra Rao
Hi Karl, No.We are not running bind on Linux box with apparmor. Thanks & Regards, Chandra M On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:40 PM Karl Lovink via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > Alan, > > Are you running bind on a Linux box with apparmor. Check your apparmor > configuration: /etc/ap

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Chandra Rao
Hi Alan, >>You've not shown how much of the /var/run directory structure exists. Does /var/run exist? What are the permissions on it? [Chandra] : /var/run directory structure is already exists and following are the permissions it's having. While launching the named service with the named user the

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Alan Clegg
On 4/10/19 11:10 AM, Karl Lovink wrote: > Alan, > > Are you running bind on a Linux box with apparmor. Check your apparmor > configuration: /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named. I'm not, but the OP might be.:-) AlanC ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.o

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Karl Lovink via bind-users
Alan, Are you running bind on a Linux box with apparmor. Check your apparmor configuration: /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named. Cheers, Karl > On 10 Apr 2019, at 16:31, Alan Clegg wrote: > >> On 4/10/19 10:19 AM, Alan Clegg wrote: >>> On 4/3/19 5:26 AM, Chandra Rao wrote: >>> While launching the

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Alan Clegg
On 4/10/19 10:19 AM, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 4/3/19 5:26 AM, Chandra Rao wrote: >> While launching the named service coming from the latest bind as >> mentioned below, We have observed that it's is not able to create >> "/var/run/named" directory with the named user in the cluster. Due to >> this we

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-10 Thread Alan Clegg
On 4/3/19 5:26 AM, Chandra Rao wrote: > While launching the named service coming from the latest bind as > mentioned below, We have observed that it's is not able to create > "/var/run/named" directory with the named user in the cluster. Due to > this we are not able to store the files "named.pid"

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-09 Thread Chandra Rao
Hi Niall O'Reilly, Thanks for the response. Still we are facing the same issue even after trying with the suggested usage of the command. # ps -eaf | grep -i named root 32198 32197 0 04:59 ?00:00:00 sudo /usr/sbin/named -u named -c /etc/ClusterDNS.conf -f named32199 32198 5 04:5

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-04 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 3 Apr 2019, at 10:26, Chandra Rao wrote: > exec /usr/sbin/named -u named -c "/etc/ClusterDNS.conf" -f You may need to use sudo /usr/sbin/named -u named ... or, if you prefer exec sudo /usr/sbin/named -u named ... Best regards, Niall O'Reilly

Re: Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-04 Thread Chandra Rao
Hi Team, Do we have any update on this issue ? Thanks in Advance. Regards, Chandra M On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:56 PM Chandra Rao wrote: > Hi Team, > > Earlier we have used bind-9.9.11-P1 in our platform and upgraded to > 9.11.5-P4 due to the EOL received for the earlier used version. > After u

Regarding named related issue observed with bind 9.11.5-P4 version

2019-04-03 Thread Chandra Rao
Hi Team, Earlier we have used bind-9.9.11-P1 in our platform and upgraded to 9.11.5-P4 due to the EOL received for the earlier used version. After upgrading we are facing the below mentioned issue related to named binary. While launching the named service coming from the latest bind as mentioned