Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-31:
Lyle Giese wrote on 2011-08-31:
On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote:
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25:
Hi list,
On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I
encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25:
Hi list,
On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I
encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain
names. A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server (192.168.151.100)
to resolve a target
On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote:
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25:
Hi list,
On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I
encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain
names. A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server
Lyle Giese wrote on 2011-08-31:
On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote:
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25:
Hi list,
On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I
encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving
domain names. A client
Hi list,
On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I
encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain
names.
A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server (192.168.151.100) to resolve
a target (www.leclercdrive.fr)
Here are the relevant logs:
Margolin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:47 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@moderators.individual.net
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
In article gl3gns$1is...@sf1.isc.org,
Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that rndc stats
dumps only a subset
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600,
Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at
least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and rndc stats?
I don't understand the question...what do you mean
Message
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:57:10 PM
Subject: SERVFAIL issues
http://marc.info/?l=bind-usersm=122239920822324w=2
http://marc.info/?l=bind-usersm=122243068905656w=2
We upgraded to 9.5.0-P1 when the Kaminsky DNS
and is an authoritative DNS server for
100+ domains.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
Hello,
Has the max-cache-size setting
-
From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
Hello,
Has the max-cache-size setting in named.conf been considered?
If not, note that in early releases of 9.5.x max-cache-size
...@iname.com
Cc: 'Fr34k'; bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
At Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:24:28 -0600,
Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Yes, I read that last night before posting. I changed it to 256M. Is
there a way using rndc to see if that took?
No, but...
And how do I
http://marc.info/?l=bind-usersm=122239920822324w=2
http://marc.info/?l=bind-usersm=122243068905656w=2
We upgraded to 9.5.0-P1 when the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability was announced
and have had intermittent issues with SERVFAIL problems for some DSL modems
that don't properly fail over to a secondary
Is this intermittent SERVFAIL issue resolved in 9.5.1-P1?
9.5.1 has many improvements that solve various SERVFAIL issues seen in the
9.5.0-P1/P2 code and includes /dev/poll, kqueue, or epoll on supported
systems.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind
13 matches
Mail list logo
