Re: SOA "minimum" vs "negative ttl"

2013-01-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:05:33AM +, Jack Tavares wrote: > When a DNS update comes into to add or modify a record and bind > eventually re-writes the master file it will rearrange the SOA and add > comments (which is fine) but it labels > [...] > Is there a reason for this or is it just a hold

SOA "minimum" vs "negative ttl"

2013-01-23 Thread Jack Tavares
I believe that RFC 2308 redefines the SOA "minimum" field to be "negative ttl" If I create a dynamically updated zone file that looks like so: [begin] $ORIGIN . $TTL 500 new.com IN SOA d62.test.com. hostmaster.d62.test.com. 2013012301 10800 3600 604800 86400 new.com IN NS d62.test.com. [end] W