> Casey Deccio wrote:
> >RFC 1035 [1] (page 44) describes the use of a list of server names
> >(SLIST) to query for a particular name. It is unclear to me from the
> >RFC as to whether the server is selected by address or by name. In
> >other words, all history (e.g., batting average and respo
Casey Deccio wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
For the *initial* NS query, I believe BIND will resolve those names down to
a flat set of addresses, all of which have equal chance of being tried, so,
yes, if a given NS name resolves to more addresses than other names,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> For the *initial* NS query, I believe BIND will resolve those names down to
> a flat set of addresses, all of which have equal chance of being tried, so,
> yes, if a given NS name resolves to more addresses than other names, it is
> more likely
Casey Deccio wrote:
RFC 1035 [1] (page 44) describes the use of a list of server names
(SLIST) to query for a particular name. It is unclear to me from the
RFC as to whether the server is selected by address or by name. In
other words, all history (e.g., batting average and response time)
be
RFC 1035 [1] (page 44) describes the use of a list of server names (SLIST)
to query for a particular name. It is unclear to me from the RFC as to
whether the server is selected by address or by name. In other words, all
history (e.g., batting average and response time) being equal, if a name
reso
5 matches
Mail list logo