In message <20100220192646.gb14...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> > Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone any clue? I am trying to understand why some resolvers handle
> > > this query well, while BIND 9.7.x returns a SERVFAIL.
>
> On 19.02.10 13:21, Alan Clegg wrote:
> > a
> Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:
>
> > Anyone any clue? I am trying to understand why some resolvers handle
> > this query well, while BIND 9.7.x returns a SERVFAIL.
On 19.02.10 13:21, Alan Clegg wrote:
> acl...@yellow:~$ dig +short airfrance.fr ns
> webaf1.airfrance.fr.
> lasvegas.airfrance.fr.
> pr
Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:
> Anyone any clue? I am trying to understand why some resolvers handle
> this query well, while BIND 9.7.x returns a SERVFAIL.
acl...@yellow:~$ dig +short airfrance.fr ns
webaf1.airfrance.fr.
lasvegas.airfrance.fr.
proof.rain.fr.
acl...@yellow:~$ dig +short @webaf1.air
Hi,
I run into an unclear situation while trying to resolve certain domains.
It happened when I tried with 9.7.0rc1, 9.7.0b and also with 9.7.0. I
dont's have a whole lot of other BIND versions at my disposal, but I
found an older one, 9.3.4-P1.2, and that one works fine.
One of the domains that
4 matches
Mail list logo