On Jun 12, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:37:52PM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
A few of our customers, running servers that they describe as
experiencing high traffic (by their own standards), have had to
have us
rebuild BIND from the stock source code for them to
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:37:52PM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Chris Buxton said:
>>> On the other hand, the builds from the Linux vendors have been less
>>> than perfectly stable at moderately high levels of traffic.
>>> Rebu
On Jun 10, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Chris Buxton said:
On the other hand, the builds from the Linux vendors have been less
than perfectly stable at moderately high levels of traffic.
Rebuilding
from stock source code has always fixed this problem. We've seen thi
Once upon a time, Chris Buxton said:
> On the other hand, the builds from the Linux vendors have been less
> than perfectly stable at moderately high levels of traffic. Rebuilding
> from stock source code has always fixed this problem. We've seen this
> problem with both the Red Hat build an
On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
<20090609113700.ga6...@evileye.atkac.englab.brq.redhat.com>, Adam Tk
ac writes:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:22:12AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
<99e6a67a9da87041a8020fbc11f480b3031cc...@exvs01.dsw.net>, "Jeff
Lig
htner
-
> > > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> > > [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> > > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:23 AM
> > > To: Chris Adams
> > > Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
> > > Subject: R
gt; From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> > [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:23 AM
> > To: Chris Adams
> > Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
> > Subject: Re: Trying to understand DNSSEC and BIND vers
-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:23 AM
> To: Chris Adams
> Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: Trying to understand DNSSEC and BIND versions better=20
>
>
> In message , Chris
> Adams write
> s:
> > Si
users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:23 AM
To: Chris Adams
Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Trying to understand DNSSEC and BIND versions better
In message , Chris
Adams write
s:
> Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end
In message , Chris Adams write
s:
> Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end of the
> year, I am just trying to understand DNSSEC support and the various
> versions of BIND a little better here, so please don't throw too many
> rocks if I ask something stupid...
>
> I run th
Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end of the
year, I am just trying to understand DNSSEC support and the various
versions of BIND a little better here, so please don't throw too many
rocks if I ask something stupid...
I run the nameservers for an ISP. For the recursive se
11 matches
Mail list logo
