Due to a little too aggressive firewall configuration we had a lot of
"deleted from unreachable cache"
messsages in the log, but absolutely no messages logged for the reason for
entering the host
into the cache, which is much more useful in tracking down the problem.
It appears to me, that the
t;bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> > Subject: Re: What does "deleted from unreachable cache" mean?
> >
> >> Excellent information, thanks!
> >
> > Agreed. I really appreciate the effort ISC has put into the KB.
> >
> >> However, it is worr
On 02/08/12 19:00, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Peter Olsson
> Date: Thursday, August 2, 2012 10:25 AM
> To: Cathy Almond
> Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Subject: Re: What does "deleted from unreachable cach
-Original Message-
From: Peter Olsson
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2012 10:25 AM
To: Cathy Almond
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: What does "deleted from unreachable cache" mean?
>Excellent information, thanks!
Agreed. I really appreciate the effort
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:26:08PM +0100, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 19/07/12 00:49, Peter Olsson wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > After my latest bind upgrade our slave server started
> > occasionally writing these messages to the log:
> >
> > master 2a02:::::2#53 (source ::#0) deleted from u
On 19/07/12 00:49, Peter Olsson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After my latest bind upgrade our slave server started
> occasionally writing these messages to the log:
>
> master 2a02:::::2#53 (source ::#0) deleted from unreachable cache
>
> master 62.xxx.xxx.2#53 (source 0.0.0.0#0) deleted from
Hello!
After my latest bind upgrade our slave server started
occasionally writing these messages to the log:
master 2a02:::::2#53 (source ::#0) deleted from unreachable cache
master 62.xxx.xxx.2#53 (source 0.0.0.0#0) deleted from unreachable cache
DNS seems to work fine anyway, and
7 matches
Mail list logo
