Re: check-names vs. acl

2010-02-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
In message 20100225123134.gb2...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: On 25.02.10 12:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I see that hosts that are not allowed to recurse are often generating check-named errors. check-names it is. I apparently too often use named so I do

check-names vs. acl

2010-02-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 25.02.10 12:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I see that hosts that are not allowed to recurse are often generating check-named errors. check-names it is. I apparently too often use named so I do this king of mistypes. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to check ACL's first and check-names

Re: check-names vs. acl

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20100225123134.gb2...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: On 25.02.10 12:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I see that hosts that are not allowed to recurse are often generating check-named errors. check-names it is. I apparently too often use named so I do this king