> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:46:44 -0500
> From: Jerry Kemp
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> IMHO, the primary benefit of chrooting is security.
>
> another, less painful option, again IMHO, is to run BIND in a jail if
> you are using BSD, or a zone if you are on Sola
On 9/27/2010 7:46 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
IMHO, the primary benefit of chrooting is security.
another, less painful option, again IMHO, is to run BIND in a jail if
you are using BSD,
The default configuration in FreeBSD is to run it chroot'ed. Given that
it's very unlikely that the chroot will
IMHO, the primary benefit of chrooting is security.
another, less painful option, again IMHO, is to run BIND in a jail if
you are using BSD, or a zone if you are on Solaris, or a Solaris based
distro.
Jerry
On 09/24/10 16:46, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Tony Finch wrote
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> A default build of bind expects to find it in /etc/named.conf
> If you are running chrooted it needs to be copied into the chroot.
Most systems these days have packages of BIND. Those that do tend to have
BIND-chroot as an option for install.
4 matches
Mail list logo
