Cathy Almond"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: discrepancy with rndc dumpdb -zones
Hi Gordon,
We've not seen this before (and it doesn't sound like anyone else has
either). What version of BIND is it? Has it reappeared since? Is this
a particularly
Hi Gordon,
We've not seen this before (and it doesn't sound like anyone else has
either). What version of BIND is it? Has it reappeared since? Is this
a particularly heavily loaded/busy server? Does it have recursive cache
as well as authoritative zones?
Kind regards,
Cathy
Gordon A. Lang w
On 24.08.10 16:56, Gordon A. Lang wrote:
> After several successful "update delete ..." nsupdate sends to the master
> DNS server, verified with dig, the "rndc dumpdb -zones" command produced
> named_dump.db file still showing the deleted records. This was repeatable
> and persistent (over the hal
After several successful "update delete ..." nsupdate sends to the master
DNS server, verified with dig, the "rndc dumpdb -zones" command produced
named_dump.db file still showing the deleted records. This was repeatable
and persistent (over the half hour time period) until I performed a hard
res
4 matches
Mail list logo