On 10/12/16 15:07, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 10/12/16 13:36, Evan Hunt wrote:
I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't good code.
? well that is news to me :-\
It's code that was contributed over ten years ago; we put
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 10/12/16 13:36, Evan Hunt wrote:
> > I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't good code.
>
> ? well that is news to me :-\
It's code that was contributed over ten years ago; we put it into dig
(hidden behind #ifd
On 10/12/16 13:36, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:40:54PM +, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote:
Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the following
message "
"Invalid option: +sigchase"
I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't goo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:40:54PM +, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote:
> Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the
> following message "
>
> "Invalid option: +sigchase"
I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't good code.
I expect we'll be removi
On 10/12/16 11:40, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote:
Hi
Running ISC Bind 9.10.4-P2 will be soon moving to 9.10.4-P3.
Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the following
message "
"Invalid option: +sigchase"
When checked found that the dig utility has to be compi
Hi
Running ISC Bind 9.10.4-P2 will be soon moving to 9.10.4-P3.
Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the
following message "
"Invalid option: +sigchase"
When checked found that the dig utility has to be compiled with
"-DDIG_SIGCHASE" option for that apparently l
6 matches
Mail list logo
