By saying things like We load the authoritative data into memory so
that is also cached data and other nonsense the vendor is stating
that this behavior is in compliance with the RFCs and refusing to fix
their code. Very frustrating, as I believe this behavior is clearly
wrong and also
My apologies if this is considered to be too off-topic.
I have a situation where my company uses a number of servers with a
commercial DNS implementation (in addition to our BIND servers). The
other implementation is Windows DNS, and there is some behavior that I
do not think is
The resolver algorithm in RFC 1034, Section 5.3.3, states
1. See if the answer is in local information, and if so return
it to the client.
and is further detailed as
Step 1 searches the cache for the desired data. If the data is in the
cache, it is assumed to be good
3 matches
Mail list logo
