on the same system and diff them.
Are they both running the same version of BIND?
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John D. Vo
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 3:15 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: number of zones
@lists.isc.org
Subject: number of zones not matching
Greetings:
My master name server says it has 102 zones but my slave says it has 98.
Without going through each and compare one with another, is there an
easier way to see what's missing on the slave?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
John D. Vo
.
-Original Message-
From: John D. Vo [mailto:j...@eagle.net]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 3:27 PM
To: Todd Snyder
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: number of zones not matching
Yes, Todd. 9.2.2.
Todd Snyder wrote:
I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way
I've
: Re: number of zones not matching
Yes, Todd. 9.2.2.
Todd Snyder wrote:
I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way
I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works.
on the master:
grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} | sort master.zones
on the slave:
grep
: number of zones not matching
Yes, Todd. 9.2.2.
Todd Snyder wrote:
/pre
blockquote type=cite
pre wrap=I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simple
st way
I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works.
on the master:
grep zone named.conf | awk '{print
BIND does NOT load RFC1918 zones. The Internet-Draft that will
allow that has been stalled for over a year now. Once that
draft
clears the working group the #if 0/#endif around the RFC 1918
zones will be removed.
Perhaps I am confused by terminology.
I am referring
6 matches
Mail list logo
