Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-22 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 16 2012, Mark Pettit wrote: [...] We have an antiquated push process that copies files into the zonefile directory and then tells BIND "rndc reload". For various reasons, "rndc reload" takes about 120 seconds to complete. BIND is not answering queries for a very large part of that time.

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Pettit
Yeah, I'm familiar with the improvements to "reconfig". You all have answered my questions. To be clear, the issue was that "reload" by itself was taking way too long. We have already implemented changes for when the *list of zones* has not changed, we do "reload " for each individually-chang

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Evan Hunt
> I was considering doing "rndc reconfig", followed by a "rndc reload > " for each of the new zones. > > Would this work? 'reconfig' reloads the configuration without reloading all of the zones, but if it sees that you've added or removed any zones in the config file, it will load or unload those

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 3/16/2012 4:10 AM, Mark Pettit wrote: We have an antiquated push process that copies files into the zonefile directory and then tells BIND "rndc reload". For various reasons, "rndc reload" takes about 120 seconds to complete. BIND is not answering queries for a very large part of that time

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Jonathan Vomacka
On 3/16/2012 4:10 AM, Mark Pettit wrote: I've read carefully through the BIND ARM and am still not sure of the answer to this, so I figured I'd ask on here. "rndc reconfig" causes BIND to re-load its config file, but unlike "rndc reload", BIND will not scan the zone files it's mastering to s

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Peter Andreev
2012/3/16 Mark Pettit > I've read carefully through the BIND ARM and am still not sure of the > answer to this, so I figured I'd ask on here. > > "rndc reconfig" causes BIND to re-load its config file, but unlike "rndc > reload", BIND will not scan the zone files it's mastering to see if there >

Re: "rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 16/03/2012 09:10, Mark Pettit wrote: Hi Mark, > However, I'm curious what I should do when an update contains both a > new config file and new zone files. If you have *new* zones, "rndc reconfig" will also load them. You don't need to run "rndc reload" for them when they are first added to th

"rndc reconfig" vs. "rndc reload"

2012-03-16 Thread Mark Pettit
I've read carefully through the BIND ARM and am still not sure of the answer to this, so I figured I'd ask on here. "rndc reconfig" causes BIND to re-load its config file, but unlike "rndc reload", BIND will not scan the zone files it's mastering to see if there have been any updates. This is