My bad. Let me restate the request -- that all the information available
via XML in the HTML statistics channel is also printed out when issuing
rndc stats.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.
org] On Behalf Of Barry
Hello!
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
You can't. You can, however, create more specific zones
(mail.zone.tld.) rather than the overlapping zone (zone.tld.).
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men Mice
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
Hello
I have a question relationated to forwarding.
I have db.myzone.com in
Chris Buxton escribió:
You can't. You can, however, create more specific zones
(mail.zone.tld.) rather than the overlapping zone (zone.tld.).
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men Mice
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
Hello
I have a question relationated to forwarding.
Chris Buxton escribió:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
Chris Buxton escribió:
You can't. You can, however, create more specific zones
(mail.zone.tld.) rather than the overlapping zone (zone.tld.).
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men Mice
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:41 AM,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.01.09 12:49, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
if you know that setting TTL to 0 is a bad idea, why do yuo think that
disabling a cache in BIND is not a bad idea?
Because under high load cache grows to maximum
On 20.01.09 12:49, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
How to disable cache in bind-9.6? ttl=0 - bad idea.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
if you know that setting TTL to 0 is a bad idea, why do yuo think that
disabling a cache in BIND is not a bad idea?
On 20.01.09 18:39, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Because
I've been beating my head against the wall with this issue, and I'm out
of ideas: I can't get reverse lookups for a particular, delegated RFC1918
net to work.
Setup:
Internal root dns.domain.com running bind 9.4.2-P2.
This host is set up as a master for 172.30/16. It delegates 172.30 to a
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:14:01PM +,
Lars Hecking lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote
a message of 87 lines which said:
This host is set up as a master for 172.30/16. It delegates 172.30
to a subdomain (A record for ns1.sub.domain.com is present
elsewhere).
Hold on! There is
Hello,
Is this possible to disable recursion for all incoming queries except
for those listed in zone statement with a forwarder.
I know that no forwarding is allowed if we disable recursion.
Something like this ( but this doesn't work I know ):
I can't match people so I can't create a view.
I have compiled BIND many times on Solaris/OpenSolaris and several
different *BSD's, and this has always been a pretty simple procedure.
I currently need to compile (a current) BIND on AIX 5.2 and it appears
to me that there is a little more work involved to get a successful
compile on this
Disabling the cache makes sense if the purpose of your
nameserver is to provide your authoritative zone data and you
have a different nameserver to handle your site's general
DNS queries.
TTL settings are part of authoritative zone data, which is
completely independent of whether you disable
I believe the behavior of the following configuration is to send back
the IP address of the forwarders to the clients, and rely on clients
to do the recursive query against the forwarders.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM, etirado@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Hello,
Is this possible to
On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:25 AM, etirado@orange-ftgroup.com etirado@orange-ftgroup.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is this possible to disable recursion for all incoming queries except
for those listed in zone statement with a forwarder.
I know that no forwarding is allowed if we disable recursion.
Hello, looking at my logs today, I am getting hammered with these:
20-Jan-2009 15:39:06.284 security: info: client 66.230.160.1#48517:
query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
20-Jan-2009 15:39:06.790 security: info: client 66.230.128.15#31593:
query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
Repeated over and over,
That's being discussed on NANOG, here's one thread:
http://markmail.org/message/ydiqnztzmz5qmusf
See here for more details in blocking them:
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html
specifically:
blackhole {
// Deny anything from the bogon networks as
//
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
That's being discussed on NANOG, here's one thread:
http://markmail.org/message/ydiqnztzmz5qmusf
See here for more details in blocking them:
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html
specifically:
blackhole {
// Deny
According to ISPrime, 66.230.128.15 and 66.230.160.1 are authoritative DNS
servers, but do not make outbound requests. As such, they only *receive*
queries from remote DNS servers (or clients). So all UDP or TCP-based DNS
requests to those two DNS servers are made *to* port 53. And those two
In message 232b45f8-acd3-427a-95e9-bc3ca5fc9...@newgeo.com, Scott Haneda writ
es:
Hello, looking at my logs today, I am getting hammered with these:
20-Jan-2009 15:39:06.284 security: info: client 66.230.160.1#48517:
query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
20-Jan-2009 15:39:06.790 security: info:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 232b45f8-acd3-427a-95e9-bc3ca5fc9...@newgeo.com, Scott
Haneda writ
es:
Hello, looking at my logs today, I am getting hammered with these:
20-Jan-2009 15:39:06.284 security: info: client 66.230.160.1#48517:
query (cache) './NS/IN'
I brought this up a few months back. For me, it is getting worse, and
I am not able to come up with a solution.
I have many clients who reg domains. They all point to my NS.
Sometimes, the client lapses hosting with me, and I delete the zones.
They usually leave the domain reg'd and my
Scott Haneda wrote:
I brought this up a few months back. For me, it is getting worse, and
I am not able to come up with a solution.
I have many clients who reg domains. They all point to my NS.
Sometimes, the client lapses hosting with me, and I delete the zones.
They usually leave the
In message fb979b33-df83-4460-a3e4-040cd165e...@newgeo.com, Scott Haneda writ
es:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 232b45f8-acd3-427a-95e9-bc3ca5fc9...@newgeo.com, Scott
Haneda writ
es:
Hello, looking at my logs today, I am getting hammered with these:
23 matches
Mail list logo
