RE: SRV records etc

2015-02-11 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
This is, of course, *not* what SRV records were intended for. In my experience, most of these proof of domain ownership idiots will also offer TXT records as an alternative. Speaking of SRV misuse/misapplication, Microsoft's use of SRV records as a generic domain-remapping mechanism for

Re: SRV records etc

2015-02-11 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.1608.1423662027.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Lightner, Jeff jlight...@dsservices.com wrote: SRV definitely still required for some applications. Some cloud based application providers have you add them to verify you own the domain to which they're tying their

Re: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel Ryslink
Hello What uncle Google found for me: http://www.bind9.net/BIND-FAQ Quote: Q: Why do I get the following errors: general: errno2result.c:109: unexpected error: general: unable to convert errno to isc_result: 14: Bad address client: UDP client handler shutting down due to fatal receive error:

RE: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Lightner, Jeff
On RHEL the kernel doesn't change within the main release (RHEL6) in this case will always be 2.6.32-xx and RHEL does the support including back porting bug and security fixes into their extended release (which isn't the same as the base kernel). They do the same thing for the BIND

RE: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Lightner, Jeff
Possible yes but I'd suspect it had been addressed if it were severe enough - I haven't actually looked at it. Another poster suggested a later update to BIND that is available in RHEL repository that may have addressed it if the version the OP has doesn't. I just wanted to make the note

Re: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel Ryslink
Okay, sorry, did not know about the backporting. Still, isn't it possible that this old bug is still present in this version of RHEL6? -- S pozdravem, Daniel Ryšlink System Administrator Dial Telecom a. s. Křižíkova 36a/237 186 00 Praha 3, Česká Republika Tel.:+420.226204627

BIND and GHOST: MySQL DLZ module possibly vulnerable

2015-02-11 Thread Chuck Aurora
Hello BIND users, When the GHOST vulnerability in GNU libc was disclosed, we received many questions from customers and users about how BIND was affected. Our official position is, as always, that operators should upgrade all linked libraries to unaffected versions, regardless of whether BIND

RE: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Md. Mahbubul Alam Reyad
Hi So, perhaps I need to update the bind package. Can anyone suggest, how can I install updated bind rpm in RHEL6.0? Sincerely Yours --- Md. Mahbubul Alam Reyad Assistant Manager CORE-IP Network || Technology Cell: +880 1976672281 || Skype:

RE: Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Md. Mahbubul Alam Reyad
Hi Mukund Its bind-9.8.2-0.23 and the OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.0 (kernel- 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64) Sincerely Yours --- Md. Mahbubul Alam Reyad Assistant Manager CORE-IP Network || Technology Cell: +880 1976672281 ||

Getting Error || unable to convert errno to isc_result

2015-02-11 Thread Md. Mahbubul Alam Reyad
Hi all Recently I am getting the following error in my DNS. Can anyone know the reason, impact solution of this error? general: error: unable to convert errno to isc_result: 92: Protocol not available general: error: socket.c:1700: unexpected error: Sincerely Yours

RE: SRV records etc

2015-02-11 Thread Lightner, Jeff
SRV definitely still required for some applications. Some cloud based application providers have you add them to verify you own the domain to which they're tying their services so you don't use them to hijack other people's domains. -Original Message- From: